Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30775172›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Nation-scale primary prevention to reduce newly incident adolescent drug use: the issue of lag time.

Hui G Cheng, Dukernse Augustin, Eric H Glass, James C Anthony

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hui G ChengDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7252-5090
Dukernse AugustinDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Eric H GlassMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
James C AnthonyDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-0929
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Training Program in Drug Dependence EpidemiologyT32DA021129 · NIDA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANTHONY, JAMES CHRISTOPHER · 2006 to 2016
$2.7M
Drug Dependence Epidemiology and EnviromicsK05DA015799 · NIDA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANTHONY, JAMES CHRISTOPHER · 2003 to 2015
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015799NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA021129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited evidence about the effects of United States (US) nation-level policy changes on the incidence of alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking. To investigate the potential primary prevention effects on precocious drug use and to clarify lag-time issues, we estimated incidence rates for specified intervals anticipating and lagging after drug policy enactment. Our hypotheses are (a) reductions in underage drinking or smoking onset and (b) increases of incidence at the legal age (i.e., 21 for drinking and 18 for smoking).

methodsThe study population is 12-23-year-old non-institutionalized US civilian residents. Estimates are from 30 community samples drawn to be nationally representative for the US National Surveys on Drug Use and Health 1979-2015. Estimates were year-by-year annual incidence rates for alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking by 12-23-year-olds, age by age. Meta-regressions estimate age-specific incidence over time.

resultsIncidence of underage alcohol drinking declined and followed a trend line that started before 1984 enactment of the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, but increased drinking incidence for 21 year olds was observed approximately 10 years after policy enactment. Eight years after the Synar amendment enactment, evidence of reduced smoking incidence started to emerge. Among 18 year olds, a slight increase in tobacco smoking incidence occurred about 10 years after the Synar amendment.

conclusionOnce nation-level policies affecting drug sales to minors are enacted, one might have to wait almost a decade before seeing tangible policy effects on drug use incidence rates.

Indexed as

IncidenceNational minimum drinking age actSynar amendmentUSA

Identifiers

PMID30775172
PMCPMC6376940
OpenAlexW2913135842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.