Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30775105›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2019

Quantitative analysis of choriocapillaris in non-human primates using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA).

Bingyao Tan, Jacqueline Chua, Veluchamy Amutha Barathi, Mani Baskaran, Anita Chan, Emily Lin, Marcus Ang, Gerd Klose, Leopold Schmetterer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bingyao TanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Jacqueline ChuaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Veluchamy Amutha BarathiSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Mani BaskaranSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Anita ChanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Emily LinSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus AngSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Gerd KloseCarl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Leopold SchmettererSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Singapore National Eye Center · SGNanyang Technological University · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choriocapillaris is a unique vascular plexus located posterior to the retinal pigment epithelium. In recent years, there is an increasing interest in the examination of the interrelationship between the choriocapillaris and eye diseases. We used several techniques to study choroidal perfusion, including laser Doppler flowmetry, laser speckle flowgraphy, and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), but with the latter no standardized algorithm for quantitative analysis has been provided. We analyzed different algorithms to quantify flow voids in non-human primates that can be easily implemented into clinical research.

Identifiers

PMID30775105
PMCPMC6363185
OpenAlexW2905870239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.