Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30775004›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

Addressing the information deficit in global health: lessons from a digital acute care platform in Sri Lanka.

Abi Beane, Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu De Silva, Priyantha Lakmini Athapattu, Saroj Jayasinghe, Anuja Unnathie Abayadeera, Mandika Wijerathne, Ishara Udayanga, Shriyananda Rathnayake, Arjen M Dondorp, Rashan Haniffa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abi BeaneNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ambepitiyawaduge Pubudu De SilvaNational Intensive Care Surveillance, Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Priyantha Lakmini AthapattuMinistry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Saroj JayasingheDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Anuja Unnathie AbayadeeraDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Mandika WijerathneDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ishara UdayangaNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Shriyananda RathnayakeInformation and Communication Technology Agency of Sri Lanka, Columbo, Sri Lanka.
Arjen M DondorpMahidol Oxford Tropical Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rashan HaniffaNetwork for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of investment in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) in systems capturing continuous information regarding care of the acutely unwell patient is hindering global efforts to address inequalities, both at facility and national level. Furthermore, this of lack of data is disempowering frontline staff and those seeking to support them, from progressing setting-relevant research and quality improvement. In contrast to high-income country (HIC) settings, where electronic surveillance has boosted the capability of governments, clinicians and researchers to engage in service-wide healthcare evaluation, healthcare information in resource-limited settings remains almost exclusively paper based. In this practice paper, we describe the efforts of a collaboration of clinicians, administrators, researchers and healthcare informaticians working in South Asia, in addressing the inequality in access to patient information in acute care. Harnessing a clinician-led collaborative approach to design and evaluation, we have implemented a national acute care information platform in Sri Lanka that is tailored to priorities of frontline staff. Iterative adaptation has ensured the platform has the flexibility to integrate with legacy paper systems, support junior team members in advocating for acutely unwell patients and has made information captured accessible to diverse stakeholders to improve service delivery. The same platform is now empowering clinicians to participate in international research and drive forwards improvements in care. During this journey, we have also gained insights on how to overcome well-described barriers to implementation of digital information tools in LMIC. We anticipate that this north-south collaborative approach to addressing the challenges of health system implementation in acute care may provide learning and inspiration to other partnerships seeking to engage in similar work.

Indexed as

health informaticshealth services researchhealth systems

Identifiers

PMID30775004
PMCPMC6352842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.