ReviewNPJ Regenerative medicine2019
Regenerative medicine curriculum for next-generation physicians.
Review in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current challenges and future directions of ATMPs in regenerative medicine.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Biomimetic Cell Membrane-Coated Scaffolds for Enhanced Tissue Regeneration.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- An analysis of stem cell training programs for physicians in the US-A mirage of credibility.Stem cell reports · 2025Article
- Toward equitable regenerative medicine: a health equity research framework for emerging regenerative treatments.Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence for cardiovascular disease risk assessment in personalised framework: a scoping review.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Modern regenerative medicine dictionary: an augmented guide to biotherapy.Regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Internet-Connected Cortical Organoids for Project-Based Stem Cell and Neuroscience Education.eNeuro · 2023Article
- Internet-connected cortical organoids for project-based stem cell and neuroscience education.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- "I just wanted to speak to someone- and there was no one…": using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the impact of a novel ATMP on early recipients.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Identification of histological threshold concepts in health sciences curricula: Students' perception.Anatomical sciences education · 2023Article
- Resolving the conflicts around Par2 opposing roles in regeneration by comparing immune-mediated and toxic-induced injuries.Inflammation and regeneration · 2022Article
- A scoping review of regenerative medicine in medical education.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Medical education across three colleges of medicine: perspectives of medical students.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Exploring Surgeons', Nurses', and Patients' Information Seeking Behavior on Medical Innovations: The Case of 3D Printed Biodegradable Implants in Breast Reconstruction.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022Article
- Emerging workforce readiness in regenerative healthcare.Regenerative medicine · 2021Article
- Regenerative medicine clinical readiness.Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Stem cell preservation for regenerative therapies: ethical and governance considerations for the health care sector.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2020Review
- Digital regenerative medicine and surgery pedagogy for virtual learning in the time of COVID-19.Regenerative medicine · 2020Article
- A Graduate-Level Interdisciplinary Curriculum in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2020Article
- The Regenerative Horizon: Opportunities for Nursing Research and Practice.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regenerative sciences are poised to transform clinical practice. The quest for regenerative solutions has, however, exposed a major gap in current healthcare education. A call for evidence-based adoption has underscored the necessity to establish rigorous regenerative medicine educational programs early in training. Here, we present a patient-centric regenerative medicine curriculum embedded into medical school core learning. Launched as a dedicated portal of new knowledge, learner proficiency was instilled by means of a discovery-translation-application blueprint. Using the "from the patient to the patient" paradigm, student experience recognized unmet patient needs, evolving regenerative technologies, and ensuing patient management solutions. Targeted on the deployment of a regenerative model of care, complementary subject matter included ethics, regulatory affairs, quality control, supply chain, and biobusiness. Completion of learning objectives was monitored by online tests, group teaching, simulated clinical examinations along with longitudinal continuity across medical school training and residency. Success was documented by increased awareness and proficiency in domain-relevant content, as well as specialty identification through practice exposure, research engagement, clinical acumen, and education-driven practice advancement. Early incorporation into mainstream medical education offers a tool to train next-generation healthcare providers equipped to adopt and deliver validated regenerative medicine solutions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.