ArticleFood and energy security2018
Root imaging showing comparisons in root distribution and ontogeny in novel
Article in Food and energy security, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The soil microbiome of Lolium perenne L. depends on host genotype, is modified by nitrogen level and varies across season.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Designing agricultural grasses to help mitigate proteolysis during ensiling to optimize protein feed provisions for livestock.Food and energy security · 2023Article
- Data management challenges for artificial intelligence in plant and agricultural research.F1000Research · 2021Article
- Do agricultural grasses bred for improved root systems provide resilience to machinery-derived soil compaction?Food and energy security · 2020Article
- A route to decreasing N pollution from livestock: Use ofFood and energy security · 2020Article
- What distinguishes data from models?European journal for philosophy of science · 2019Article
- Root imaging showing comparisons in root distribution and ontogeny in novelFood and energy security · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incorporation of new sophisticated phenotyping technologies within a crop improvement program allows for a plant breeding strategy that can include selections for major root traits previously inaccessible due to the challenges in their phenotype assessment. High-throughput precision phenotyping technology is employed to evaluate root ontogeny and progressive changes to root architecture of both novel amphiploid and introgression lines of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.