Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774739›Full record

ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2019

Cost-Effectiveness of the Aerobika® Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Device in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations in Canada.

Nguyen Xuan Thanh, Philip Jacobs, Jason Suggett, Andrew McIvor, Alan Kaplan

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05801952 (Evaluation of the Short-term Use of Selected PEP and OPEP Devices in Cystic Fibrosis Patients During an Exacerbation of the Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05801952 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Short-term Use of Selected PEP and OPEP Devices in Cystic Fibrosis Patients During an Exacerbation of the Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, PolandRan2020 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsCystic FibrosisArmsAerobika* OPEP, PARI O-PEP (Flutter), PARI PEP® S System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impact of AerobikaFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nguyen Xuan ThanhInstitute of Health Economics, 1200 10405 Jasper Avenue, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6536-4321
Philip JacobsDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jason SuggettTrudell Medical International, London, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew McIvorMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Alan KaplanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8795-5528
Institute of Health Economics · CAMcMaster University · CATrudell Medical International (Canada) · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Aerobika® oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) device is a hand-held, drug-free medical device that has been shown to improve lung function and improve health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We estimated the cost-effectiveness of this device among postexacerbation COPD patients in the Canadian healthcare system. Methods: We performed a cost-utility analysis using a Markov model to compare both costs and outcome of patients with COPD who had recently experienced an exacerbation between 2 treatment arms: patients who used the Aerobika® device and patients who did not use the Aerobika® device. This cost-utility analysis included costs based on the Alberta healthcare system perspective as these represent Canadian experience. A one-year horizon with 12 monthly cycles was used. Results: For a patient after 1 year, the use of the Aerobika® device would save $694 in healthcare costs and produce 0.04 more in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in comparison with no positive expiratory pressure (PEP)/OPEP therapy. In other words, the economic outcome of the device was dominant (i.e., more effective and less costly). The probability for this device to be the dominant strategy was 72%. With a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained, the probability for the Aerobika® device to be cost-effective was 77%. Conclusions: Given one of the major treatment goals in the GOLD guidelines is to minimize the negative impact of exacerbations and prevent re-exacerbations, the Aerobika® OPEP device should be viewed as a potential component of a treatment strategy to improve symptom control and reduce the risk of re-exacerbations in patients with COPD.

Indexed as

CanadaCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ProgressionHumansModels, EconomicPositive-Pressure RespirationPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID30774739
PMCPMC6350564
OpenAlexW2908754662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.