Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774719›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change

Social science perspectives on drivers of and responses to global climate change.

Andrew K Jorgenson, Shirley Fiske, Klaus Hubacek, Jia Li, Tom McGovern, Torben Rick, Juliet B Schor, William Solecki, Richard York, Ariela Zycherman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multidimensional analysis of global climate change: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Archaeology, climate, and global change in the Age of Humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Expanding use of archaeology in climate change response by changing its social environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew K JorgensonDepartment of Sociology Boston College Chestnut Hill Massachusetts.
Shirley FiskeDepartment of Anthropology University of Maryland College Park Maryland.
Klaus HubacekDepartment of Geographical Sciences University of Maryland College Park Maryland.
Jia LiU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington DC.
Tom McGovernDepartment of Anthropology Hunter College-CUNY New York New York.
Torben RickDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington DC.
Juliet B SchorDepartment of Sociology Boston College Chestnut Hill Massachusetts.
William SoleckiDepartment of Geography Hunter College-CUNY New York New York.
Richard YorkDepartment of Sociology University of Oregon Eugene Oregon.
Ariela ZychermanUSDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture Washington DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides a review of recent anthropological, archeological, geographical, and sociological research on anthropogenic drivers of climate change, with a particular focus on drivers of carbon emissions, mitigation and adaptation. The four disciplines emphasize cultural, economic, geographic, historical, political, and social-structural factors to be important drivers of and responses to climate change. Each of these disciplines has unique perspectives and makes noteworthy contributions to our shared understanding of anthropogenic drivers, but they also complement one another and contribute to integrated, multidisciplinary frameworks. The article begins with discussions of research on temporal dimensions of human drivers of carbon emissions, highlighting interactions between long-term and near-term drivers. Next, descriptions of the disciplines' contributions to the understanding of mitigation and adaptation are provided. It concludes with a summary of key lessons offered by the four disciplines as well as suggestions for future research. This article is categorized under: Climate Economics > Economics and Climate Change.

Indexed as

adaptationanthropologyarcheologyclimate changegeographygreenhouse gas emissionsmitigationsocial sciencesociologysustainability

Identifiers

PMID30774719
PMCPMC6360453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.