Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774638›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019

Adaptive Introgression: An Untapped Evolutionary Mechanism for Crop Adaptation.

Concetta Burgarella, Adeline Barnaud, Ndjido Ardo Kane, Frédérique Jankowski, Nora Scarcelli, Claire Billot, Yves Vigouroux, Cécile Berthouly-Salazar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic diversity and the domestication history of cotton (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Insights Into the Almond Domestication History.Evolutionary applications · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Biocultural diversity and crop improvement.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Concetta BurgarellaInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR DIADE, Montpellier, France.
Adeline BarnaudInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR DIADE, Montpellier, France.
Ndjido Ardo KaneLaboratoire National de Recherches sur les Productions Végétales, Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles, Dakar, Senegal.
Frédérique JankowskiCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UPR GREEN, Montpellier, France.
Nora ScarcelliInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR DIADE, Montpellier, France.
Claire BillotCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UMR AGAP, Montpellier, France.
Yves VigourouxInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR DIADE, Montpellier, France.
Cécile Berthouly-SalazarInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR DIADE, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global environmental changes strongly impact wild and domesticated species biology and their associated ecosystem services. For crops, global warming has led to significant changes in terms of phenology and/or yield. To respond to the agricultural challenges of this century, there is a strong need for harnessing the genetic variability of crops and adapting them to new conditions. Gene flow, from either the same species or a different species, may be an immediate primary source to widen genetic diversity and adaptions to various environments. When the incorporation of a foreign variant leads to an increase of the fitness of the recipient pool, it is referred to as "adaptive introgression". Crop species are excellent case studies of this phenomenon since their genetic variability has been considerably reduced over space and time but most of them continue exchanging genetic material with their wild relatives. In this paper, we review studies of adaptive introgression, presenting methodological approaches and challenges to detecting it. We pay particular attention to the potential of this evolutionary mechanism for the adaptation of crops. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of farmers' knowledge and practices in shaping wild-to-crop gene flow. Finally, we argue that screening the wild introgression already existing in the cultivated gene pool may be an effective strategy for uncovering wild diversity relevant for crop adaptation to current environmental changes and for informing new breeding directions.

Indexed as

adaptive introgressioncropsdomesticationfarmer’s practicesgene flowselectionwild relatives

Identifiers

PMID30774638
PMCPMC6367218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.