Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774391›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2019

Two vs four puffs of albuterol: does dose change bronchodilator response?

Anne V McLaughlin, Anita Bhandari, Craig M Schramm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne V McLaughlinDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA, amclaughlin@connecticutchildrens.org.
Anita BhandariDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Craig M SchrammDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA, amclaughlin@connecticutchildrens.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReversible obstruction on spirometry may be used to diagnose asthma. As per 2005 American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines, our pulmonary center began using 360 µg (four puffs) of albuterol rather than 180 µg (two puffs) to determine reversibility on spirometry starting in 2009. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that fewer patients would respond to two puffs of albuterol than four puffs during spirometric testing.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed records from new asthmatics seen in Pediatric Pulmonary Clinic from March 2002 to April 2014 who performed reproducible spirometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they had received two or four puffs of albuterol for bronchodilator assessment. A positive bronchodilator response was defined as an increase of ≥12% in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV

resultsData were collected for 240 patients; 115 patients received two puffs of albuterol and 125 patients received four puffs. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. There were no differences following two puffs or four puffs in changes in FEV

conclusionBased on the mean change in FEV

Indexed as

asthmapulmonary function testingreversible obstructive lung disease

Identifiers

PMID30774391
PMCPMC6362946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.