Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774386›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2019

HIFU is safe, effective, and feasible in pancreatic cancer patients: a monocentric retrospective study among 523 patients.

Zhouyu Ning, Jing Xie, Qiwen Chen, Chenyue Zhang, Litao Xu, Libin Song, Zhiqiang Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Application of Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Tendinopathy: An In Vivo Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy Study.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinical translation of abdominal histotripsy: a review of preclinical studies in large animal models.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evolving Concepts Regarding Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhouyu NingDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, mengzhq@yeah.net.
Jing XieDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, mengzhq@yeah.net.
Qiwen ChenDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, mengzhq@yeah.net.
Chenyue ZhangDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, mengzhq@yeah.net.
Litao XuDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, mengzhq@yeah.net.
Libin SongDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, mengzhq@yeah.net.
Zhiqiang MengDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, mengzhq@yeah.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) in treating unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 523 unresectable PDAC patients were recruited from December 30, 2007 to January 30, 2015 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Among them, 347 received HIFU combined with GEM (with regional intra-arterial chemotherapy [RIAC] or with systemic chemotherapy) and the remaining patients received GEM only. Postoperative complications were observed, and overall survival was recorded.

resultsThe median overall survival of patients who received HIFU combined with GEM vs GEM alone was 7.4 vs 6.0 months (

conclusionWe demonstrated the survival benefit of HIFU among PDAC patients treated with GEM. The benefit was most obvious in PDAC patients treated with HIFU plus RIAC and systemic chemotherapy.

Indexed as

gemcitabineHIFUmultimodality therapyPDACprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30774386
PMCPMC6362964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.