Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774335›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2019

Development of biosurfactant-based graphene quantum dot conjugate as a novel and fluorescent theranostic tool for cancer.

Smriti Bansal, Joga Singh, Uma Kumari, Indu Pal Kaur, Ravi Pratap Barnwal, Ravinder Kumar, Suman Singh, Gurpal Singh, Mary Chatterjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RSC advances · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Conventional Nanosized Drug Delivery Systems for Cancer Applications.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Present Scenario of Bioconjugates in Cancer Therapy: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Smriti BansalBiotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering & Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, maryc@pu.ac.in.
Joga SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, gurpal79@pu.ac.in.
Uma KumariDepartment of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Indu Pal KaurDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, gurpal79@pu.ac.in.
Ravi Pratap BarnwalDepartment of Biophysics, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Ravinder KumarDepartment of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Suman SinghDepartment of Agronomics, Central Scientific Instruments Organisation, Chandigarh, India.
Gurpal SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, gurpal79@pu.ac.in.
Mary ChatterjeeBiotechnology Engineering, University Institute of Engineering & Technology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, maryc@pu.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiosurfactants are amphipathic molecules of microbial origin that reduce surface and interfacial tension at gas-liquid-solid interfaces. Earlier, the biosurfactant was isolated and characterized in our laboratory from MATERIALS AND

methodsGraphene quantum dots (GQDs) were synthesized by bottom-up approach through pyrolysis of citric acid. GQDs were conjugated with both biosurfactant and folic acid (FA) using carbodiimide chemistry. The prepared GQD bioconjugate was studied for diagnostic and therapeutic effects against cancer cells. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Photoluminescence quantum yield (QY) of plain GQDs was measured as 12.8%. QY for biosurfactant conjugated GQDs and FA-biosurfactant conjugated GQDs was measured as 10.4% and 9.02%, respectively, and it was sufficient for targeting cancer cells. MTT assay showed that more than 90% of cells remained viable at concentration of 1 mg/mL, hence GQDs seemed to be non-toxic to cells. Biosurfactant conjugated GQDs caused 50% reduction in cellular viability within 24 hours. FA conjugation further increased the specificity of bioconjugated GQDs toward tumor cells, which is clearly evident from the drug internalization studies using confocal laser scanning microscopy. A higher amount of drug uptake was observed when bioconjugated GQDs were decorated with FA.

conclusionThe ability of GQD bioconjugate could be used as a theranostic tool for cancer. It is foreseen that in near future cancer can be detected and/or treated at an early stage by utilizing biosurfactant conjugated GQDs. Therefore, the proposed study would provide a stepping stone to improve the life of cancer patients.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalFluorescenceFolic AcidGraphiteHumansMCF-7 CellsNeoplasmsQuantum DotsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredSurface-Active AgentsTheranostic NanomedicineX-Ray DiffractionFolic AcidGraphiteSurface-Active Agentsbioconjugationcancer therapyfolic acid receptorgraphene quantum dotsnanocarriernanomedicine

Identifiers

PMID30774335
PMCPMC6354693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.