Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774332›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2019

Pemetrexed-loaded nanoparticles targeted to malignant pleural mesothelioma cells: an in vitro study.

Emanuela Cova, Laura Pandolfi, Miriam Colombo, Vanessa Frangipane, Simona Inghilleri, Monica Morosini, Simona Mrakic-Sposta, Sarah Moretti, Manuela Monti, Ymera Pignochino and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. CD146: a promising target in respiratory diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. EGFR-targeted pemetrexed therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Emanuela CovaClinic of Lung Diseases, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, e.cova@smatteo.pv.it.
Laura PandolfiClinic of Lung Diseases, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, e.cova@smatteo.pv.it.
Miriam ColomboDeparment of Biotechnology and Bioscience, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy, miriam.colombo@unimib.it.
Vanessa FrangipaneClinic of Lung Diseases, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, e.cova@smatteo.pv.it.
Simona InghilleriClinic of Lung Diseases, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, e.cova@smatteo.pv.it.
Monica MorosiniClinic of Lung Diseases, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, e.cova@smatteo.pv.it.
Simona Mrakic-SpostaNational Council of Research, Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, Segrate, Milan, Italy.
Sarah MorettiNational Council of Research, Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, Segrate, Milan, Italy.
Manuela MontiLaboratory of Biotechnology, Research Center of Rigenerative Medicine, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Ymera PignochinoExperimental Clinical Molecular Oncology, IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Silvia BenvenutiExperimental Clinical Molecular Oncology, IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Davide ProsperiDeparment of Biotechnology and Bioscience, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy, miriam.colombo@unimib.it.
Giulia StellaClinic of Lung Diseases, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, e.cova@smatteo.pv.it.
Patrizia MorbiniDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Pathology Unit, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Federica MeloniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pneumology Unit, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology · ITFoundation Center · USIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor characterized by poor prognosis. Its incidence is steadily increasing due to widespread asbestos exposure. There is still no effective therapy for MPM. Pemetrexed (Pe) is one of the few chemotherapeutic agents approved for advanced-stage disease, although the objective response to the drug is limited. The use of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) as a drug delivery system promises several advantages, including specific targeting of malignant cells, with increased intracellular drug accumulation and reduced systemic toxicity, and, in the case of MPM, direct treatment administration into the pleural space. This study aims at exploring CD146 as a potential MPM cell-specific target for engineered Pe-loaded GNPs and to assess their effectiveness in inhibiting MPM cell line growth.

methodsMPM cell lines and primary cultures obtained by pleural effusions from MPM patients were assayed for CD146 expression by flow cytometry. Internalization by MPM cell lines of fluorescent dye-marked GNPs decorated with a monoclonal anti CD146 coated GNPs (GNP-HC) was proven by confocal microscopy. The effects of anti CD146 coated GNPs loaded with Pe (GNP-HCPe) on MPM cell lines were evaluated by cell cycle (flow cytometry), viability (MTT test), clonogenic capacity (soft agar assay), ROS production (electric paramagnetic resonance), motility (wound healing assay), and apoptosis (flow cytometry).

resultsGNP-HC were selectively uptaken by MPM cells within 1 hour. MPM cell lines were blocked in the S cell cycle phase in the presence of GNP-HCPe. Both cell viability and motility were significantly affected by nanoparticle treatment compared to Pe. Apoptotic rate and ROS production were significantly higher in the presence of nanoparticles. Clonogenic capacity was completely inhibited following nanoparticle internalization.

conclusionGNP-HCPe treatment displays in vitro antineoplastic action and is more effective than Pe alone in inhibiting MPM cell line malignant phenotype. The innovative use of specifically targeted GNPs opens the perspective of local intrapleural administration to avoid normal cell toxicity and enhance chemotherapy efficacy.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBiopsyCD146 AntigenCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalEndocytosisGoldHumansLung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaMesothelioma, MalignantMetal NanoparticlesPemetrexedCD146 AntigenGoldPemetrexedReactive Oxygen Speciesgold nanoparticlesintrapleural deliverymesotheliomananodrug deliverypemetrexed

Identifiers

PMID30774332
PMCPMC6361319
OpenAlexW2913940209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.