Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774324›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Minimal clinically important difference of 3-minute chair rise test and the DIRECT questionnaire after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients.

Jonathan Lévesque, Anestis Antoniadis, Pei Zhi Li, Frédéric Herengt, Christophe Brosson, Jean-Marie Grosbois, Alain Bernady, Anthony Bender, Murielle Favre, Antoine Guerder and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03286660 (Chair Rise Tests for a Simplified Evaluation of Functional Response After a Rehabilitation Program in Patients COPD.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03286660 nacompletednot on this map

Chair Rise Tests for a Simplified Evaluation of Functional Response After a Rehabilitation Program in Patients COPD.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LilleRan2014 to 2017Enrolled127ConditionsEvaluations, Rehabilitation, COPDArmsChair Rise Tests and short questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How to Assess Breathlessness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan LévesqueDepartment of Medicine, Pneumology Service, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anestis AntoniadisLaboratoire Jean Kuntzmann UMR5224, Statistics Department, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Pei Zhi LiMontreal Chest Institute, McGill University Health Center Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Frédéric HerengtCentre de Réadaptation Cardio-Respiratoire-Dieulefit Santé, Dieulefit, France.
Christophe BrossonPrivate Physiotherapist, Cours Liberation, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Marie GrosboisPneumology Service, Centre Hospitalier de Béthune, Béthune, France.
Alain BernadyToki-Eder Centre Médical Cardio-Respiratoire, Cambo-les-Bains, France.
Anthony BenderPrivate Physiotherapist, Boulevard de Metz Mont-Saint-Martin, France.
Murielle FavreCentre de Pneumologie Henri Bazire, Saint-Julien-de-Ratz, France.
Antoine GuerderAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Département R3S, Paris, France.
Pascale SurpasCentre Médical de Bayère, Charnay, France.
Thomas SimilowskiAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles Foix, Service de Pneumologie, Médecine Intensive et Réanimation, Département R3S, Paris, France.
Bernard AguilaniuFaculty of Medicine, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France, b.aguilaniu@icloud.com.
Bayer (France) · FRCentre Hospitalier de Béthune · FRHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAInserm · FRLaboratoire Jean Kuntzmann · FRMcGill University Health Centre · CASorbonne Université · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 3-minute chair rise test (3-minute CRT) and the Disability Related to COPD Tool (DIRECT) are two reproducible and valid short tests that can assess the benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in terms of functional capacity and dyspnea in everyday activities.

methodsWe determined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the DIRECT questionnaire and 3-minute CRT using distribution methods and anchor encroaches with a panel of eight standard tests in a cohort of 116 COPD patients who completed a PR program in real-life settings.

resultsThe estimated MCID for the 3-minute CRT and DIRECT scores was five repetitions and two units, respectively, using separate and combined independent anchors. The all-patient (body mass index-obstruction-dyspnea-exercise [BODE] scores 0-7), BODE 0-2 (n=42), and BODE 3-4 (n=50) groups showed improvements greater than the MCID in most tests and questionnaires used. In contrast, the BODE 5-7 group (n=24) showed improvements greater than MCID in only the 3-minute CRT, 6-minute walk test, endurance exercise test, and DIRECT questionnaire. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThis study demonstrates that the short and simple DIRECT questionnaire and 3-minute CRT are responsive to capture the beneficial effects of a PR program in COPD patients, including those with severe disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03286660.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationExercise TestMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceSurveys and QuestionnairesActivities of Daily LivingAgedEuropeExercise ToleranceFemaleHealth StatusHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective Studieschair testsCOPDMCIDoutcomes assessmentpulmonary rehabilitationtools

Identifiers

PMID30774324
PMCPMC6349077
OpenAlexW2910327244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.