Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Minimal clinically important difference of 3-minute chair rise test and the DIRECT questionnaire after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03286660 (Chair Rise Tests for a Simplified Evaluation of Functional Response After a Rehabilitation Program in Patients COPD.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Chair Rise Tests for a Simplified Evaluation of Functional Response After a Rehabilitation Program in Patients COPD.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prehabilitation programs for individuals with cancer: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on functional and psychological parameters in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Exploration of the minimal clinically important difference value of the 3-min simulated pedal motion in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A self-controlled prospective clinical trial.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Article
- The Non-Paced 3-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test: Feasibility and Clinical Relevance for Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assessment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A machine learning approach to predict extreme inactivity in COPD patients using non-activity-related clinical data.PloS one · 2021Article
- How to Assess Breathlessness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021Review
- Evaluation of the 3-minute chair rise test as part of preoperative evaluation for patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- Home-based or remote exercise testing in chronic respiratory disease, during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A rapid review.Chronic respiratory diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 3-minute chair rise test (3-minute CRT) and the Disability Related to COPD Tool (DIRECT) are two reproducible and valid short tests that can assess the benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in terms of functional capacity and dyspnea in everyday activities.
methodsWe determined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the DIRECT questionnaire and 3-minute CRT using distribution methods and anchor encroaches with a panel of eight standard tests in a cohort of 116 COPD patients who completed a PR program in real-life settings.
resultsThe estimated MCID for the 3-minute CRT and DIRECT scores was five repetitions and two units, respectively, using separate and combined independent anchors. The all-patient (body mass index-obstruction-dyspnea-exercise [BODE] scores 0-7), BODE 0-2 (n=42), and BODE 3-4 (n=50) groups showed improvements greater than the MCID in most tests and questionnaires used. In contrast, the BODE 5-7 group (n=24) showed improvements greater than MCID in only the 3-minute CRT, 6-minute walk test, endurance exercise test, and DIRECT questionnaire. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThis study demonstrates that the short and simple DIRECT questionnaire and 3-minute CRT are responsive to capture the beneficial effects of a PR program in COPD patients, including those with severe disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03286660.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.