Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30774180›Full record

ArticleAerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research2017

Field Performance of a Novel Passive Bioaerosol Sampler using Polarized Ferroelectric Polymer Films.

Jennifer Therkorn, Nirmala Thomas, Jerry Scheinbeim, Gediminas Mainelis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Development and initial testing of an active low-power, ferroelectric film-based bioaerosol sampler.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2020
    Article
  9. Development and Comparison of Complementary Methods to Study Potential Skin and Inhalational Exposure to Pathogens During Personal Protective Equipment Doffing.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Field Performance of a Novel Passive Bioaerosol Sampler using Polarized Ferroelectric Polymer Films.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer TherkornDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Nirmala ThomasDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Jerry ScheinbeimDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.
Gediminas MainelisDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Emily S Barrett · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passive bioaerosol samplers can improve environmental and health protection by enhancing the practicality and cost-effectiveness of air sampling. Here, we present the outdoor field testing of a novel, passive bioaerosol sampler, the Rutgers Electrostatic Passive Sampler (REPS), based on the use of polarized, ferroelectric polymer film (poly(vinylidene fluoride)). Four 10-day-long field campaigns were conducted to compare total (culturable + non-culturable) and culturable bioaerosol collection efficiencies of REPS to passive samplers (PTFE settling filters and agar settling plates). These collection efficiencies were calculated relative to performance of an active, reference Button Sampler. Compared to passive PTFE filters, which exclusively rely on gravitational particle deposition, REPS collected a 7-fold higher total microorganism quantity. Relative to the Button Sampler, REPS collected 25% of the total number of bacteria and fungi and 65% of the culturable bacteria. Furthermore, REPS achieved this performance without any air movers, pumps, batteries or external power. Since the Button Samplers operated at 4 L/min, REPS was calibrated to have equivalent sampling rates of 2.6 L/min and 1.0 L/min for culturable bacteria and total microorganisms, respectively. These results suggest that REPS can passively collect airborne microorganisms, including culturable bacteria, with high efficiency over long-term sampling durations. REPS can provide better preservation of bacterial culturability because it has no active airflow, which desiccates microbes in active samplers. Since there are limited options available for long-term, unattended bioaerosol sampling, REPS can complement currently available bioaerosol sampling technologies for numerous environmental health applications, such as exposure assessment for epidemiology and monitoring aeroallergen trends.

Indexed as

bioaerosol samplingbiosamplerfield measurementspassive aerosol samplingpolarized ferroelectric polymer filmRutgers Electrostatic Passive Sampler (REPS)

Identifiers

PMID30774180
PMCPMC6377157
OpenAlexW2605776094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.