ArticleAerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research2017
Field Performance of a Novel Passive Bioaerosol Sampler using Polarized Ferroelectric Polymer Films.
Article in Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in Airborne Viral Nucleic Acid Detection with Wearable Devices.Advanced sensor research · 2024Article
- Research progress of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on aerosol collection and detection.Chinese chemical letters = Zhongguo hua xue kuai bao · 2023Review
- A comprehensive review of microbial contamination in the indoor environment: sources, sampling, health risks, and mitigation strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Passive Bioaerosol Samplers: A Complementary Tool for Bioaerosol Research. A Review.Journal of aerosol science · 2022Article
- Development and initial testing of an active low-power, ferroelectric film-based bioaerosol sampler.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2022Article
- Challenges and Perspectives for Biosensing of Bioaerosol Containing Pathogenic Microorganisms.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Integration of sample preparation with RNA-Amplification in a hand-held device for airborne virus detection.Analytica chimica acta · 2021Article
- Bioaerosol Sampling: Classical Approaches, Advances, and Perspectives.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2020Article
- Development and Comparison of Complementary Methods to Study Potential Skin and Inhalational Exposure to Pathogens During Personal Protective Equipment Doffing.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019Article
- Crawling-induced floor dust resuspension affects the microbiota of the infant breathing zone.Microbiome · 2018Article
- Field Performance of a Novel Passive Bioaerosol Sampler using Polarized Ferroelectric Polymer Films.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Passive bioaerosol samplers can improve environmental and health protection by enhancing the practicality and cost-effectiveness of air sampling. Here, we present the outdoor field testing of a novel, passive bioaerosol sampler, the Rutgers Electrostatic Passive Sampler (REPS), based on the use of polarized, ferroelectric polymer film (poly(vinylidene fluoride)). Four 10-day-long field campaigns were conducted to compare total (culturable + non-culturable) and culturable bioaerosol collection efficiencies of REPS to passive samplers (PTFE settling filters and agar settling plates). These collection efficiencies were calculated relative to performance of an active, reference Button Sampler. Compared to passive PTFE filters, which exclusively rely on gravitational particle deposition, REPS collected a 7-fold higher total microorganism quantity. Relative to the Button Sampler, REPS collected 25% of the total number of bacteria and fungi and 65% of the culturable bacteria. Furthermore, REPS achieved this performance without any air movers, pumps, batteries or external power. Since the Button Samplers operated at 4 L/min, REPS was calibrated to have equivalent sampling rates of 2.6 L/min and 1.0 L/min for culturable bacteria and total microorganisms, respectively. These results suggest that REPS can passively collect airborne microorganisms, including culturable bacteria, with high efficiency over long-term sampling durations. REPS can provide better preservation of bacterial culturability because it has no active airflow, which desiccates microbes in active samplers. Since there are limited options available for long-term, unattended bioaerosol sampling, REPS can complement currently available bioaerosol sampling technologies for numerous environmental health applications, such as exposure assessment for epidemiology and monitoring aeroallergen trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.