ArticleIET systems biology2019
Efficient anticorrelated variance reduction for stochastic simulation of biochemical reactions.
Article in IET systems biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigate the computational challenge of improving the accuracy of the stochastic simulation estimation by inducing negative correlation through the anticorrelated variance reduction technique. A direct application of the technique to the stochastic simulation algorithm (SSA), employing the inverse transformation, is not efficient for simulating large networks because its computational cost is similar to the sum of independent simulation runs. We propose in this study a new algorithm that employs the propensity bounds of reactions, introduced recently in their rejection-based SSA, to correlate and synchronise the trajectories during the simulation. The selection of reaction firings by our approach is exact due to the rejection-based mechanism. In addition, by applying the anticorrelated variance technique to select reaction firings, our approach can induce substantial correlation between realisations, hence reducing the variance of the estimator. The computational advantage of our rejection-based approach in comparison with the traditional inverse transformation is that it only needs to maintain a single data structure storing propensity bounds of reactions, which is updated infrequently, hence achieving better performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.