Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30773280›Full record

SynthesisLancet (London, England)2019

Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses.

Caroline Ovadia, Paul T Seed, Alexandros Sklavounos, Victoria Geenes, Chiara Di Ilio, Jenny Chambers, Katherine Kohari, Yannick Bacq, Nuray Bozkurt, Romana Brun-Furrer and 30 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07428226 (Serum Bile Acid Profiles in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 250 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
250citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
27.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07428226 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Serum Bile Acid Profiles in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy

TypeobservationalSponsorJena University HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled74ConditionsIntrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

250 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 546 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. FIGO guideline on liver disease and pregnancy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Fetal death: Expert consensus of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pregnancy AfterJournal of medical cases · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

190 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors at 20 institutions in 15 countries.

Caroline OvadiaDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Paul T SeedDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Alexandros SklavounosDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Victoria GeenesDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Chiara Di IlioDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Jenny ChambersDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK; Women's Health Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Katherine KohariDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yannick BacqDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.
Nuray BozkurtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Romana Brun-FurrerDivision of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laura BullDepartment of Medicine and Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Maria C EstiúRamón Sardá Mother's and Children's Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Monika GrymowiczDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Berrin GunaydinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
William M HagueRobinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Christian HaslingerDivision of Obstetrics, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yayi HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tetsuya KawakitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Ayse G KebapcilarDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Levent KebapcilarInternal Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Jūratė KondrackienėDepartment of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Maria P H KosterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Aneta Kowalska-KańkaObstetrics and Gynaecology Clinic, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland.
Limas KupčinskasInstitute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Richard H LeeObstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anna LocatelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Rocio I R MaciasNational Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Hanns-Ulrich MarschallDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Martijn A OudijkDepartment of Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Yael RazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eli RimonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Dan ShanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yong ShaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Rachel TribeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Valeria TripodiSchool of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cigdem Yayla AbideClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children's Health Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ilter YenidedeClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Women and Children's Health Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Jim G ThorntonDivision of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lucy C ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Catherine WilliamsonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: catherine.williamson@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBGazi University · TRLithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRSelçuk University · TRTel Aviv University · ILUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHChongqing Medical University · CNErasmus University Rotterdam · NLHospital Ramos Mejía · ARMedical University of Warsaw · PLMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USSichuan University · CNUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversité de Tours · FRUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

Department of Health EME/12/164/16Department of Health RP-2014-05-019Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, but the association with the concentration of specific biochemical markers is unclear. We aimed to quantify the adverse perinatal effects of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in women with increased serum bile acid concentrations and determine whether elevated bile acid concentrations were associated with the risk of stillbirth and preterm birth.

methodsWe did a systematic review by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases for studies published from database inception to June 1, 2018, reporting perinatal outcomes for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy when serum bile acid concentrations were available. Inclusion criteria were studies defining intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy based upon pruritus and elevated serum bile acid concentrations, with or without raised liver aminotransferase concentrations. Eligible studies were case-control, cohort, and population-based studies, and randomised controlled trials, with at least 30 participants, and that reported bile acid concentrations and perinatal outcomes. Studies at potential higher risk of reporter bias were excluded, including case reports, studies not comprising cohorts, or successive cases seen in a unit; we also excluded studies with high risk of bias from groups selected (eg, a subgroup of babies with poor outcomes were explicitly excluded), conference abstracts, and Letters to the Editor without clear peer review. We also included unpublished data from two UK hospitals. We did a random effects meta-analysis to determine risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Aggregate data for maternal and perinatal outcomes were extracted from case-control studies, and individual patient data (IPD) were requested from study authors for all types of study (as no control group was required for the IPD analysis) to assess associations between biochemical markers and adverse outcomes using logistic and stepwise logistic regression. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017069134.

findingsWe assessed 109 full-text articles, of which 23 studies were eligible for the aggregate data meta-analysis (5557 intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy cases and 165 136 controls), and 27 provided IPD (5269 intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy cases). Stillbirth occurred in 45 (0·83%) of 4936 intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy cases and 519 (0·32%) of 163 947 control pregnancies (odds ratio [OR] 1·46 [95% CI 0·73-2·89]; I

interpretationThe risk of stillbirth is increased in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and singleton pregnancies when serum bile acids concentrations are of 100 μmol/L or more. Because most women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy have bile acids below this concentration, they can probably be reassured that the risk of stillbirth is similar to that of pregnant women in the general population, provided repeat bile acid testing is done until delivery.

fundingTommy's, ICP Support, UK National Institute of Health Research, Wellcome Trust, and Genesis Research Trust.

Indexed as

StillbirthAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBile Acids and SaltsBilirubinBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCholestasis, IntrahepaticCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPerinatal DeathPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBile Acids and SaltsBilirubinBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30773280
PMCPMC6396441
OpenAlexW2912839392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.