Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30773147›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2020

Distinct temporal brain dynamics in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia during emotion regulation.

Liwen Zhang, Hui Ai, Esther M Opmeer, Jan-Bernard C Marsman, Lisette van der Meer, Henricus G Ruhé, André Aleman, Marie-José van Tol

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Abnormal functional neurocircuitry underpinning emotional processing in fibromyalgia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Effect of Medication Therapy Plus tDCS on Problem-solving and Emotion Regulation of Patients with Bipolar Disorder Type I.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Liwen ZhangDepartment of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Hui AiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Esther M OpmeerUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jan-Bernard C MarsmanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Lisette van der MeerDepartment of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren, the Netherlands.
Henricus G RuhéDepartment of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
André AlemanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Marie-José van TolUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLLentis · NLNational University of Singapore · SGRadboud University Nijmegen · NLShenzhen University · CNUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisturbances in emotion regulation (ER) are characteristic of both patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia (SZ). We investigated the temporal dynamics of brain activation during cognitive ER in BD and SZ to understand the contribution of temporal characteristics of disturbed ER to their unique and shared symptomatology.

methodForty-six participants performed an ER-task (BD, n = 15; SZ, n = 16; controls, n = 15) during functional magnetic resonance imaging, in which they were instructed to use cognitive reappraisal techniques to regulate their emotional responses. Finite impulse response modeling was applied to estimate the temporal dynamics of brain responses during cognitive reappraisal (v. passive attending) of negative pictures. Group, time, and group × time effects were tested using multivariate modeling.

resultsWe observed a group × time interaction during ER in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), supplementary motor area (SMA) and inferior occipital gyrus. Patients with SZ demonstrated initial hyper-activation of the VLPFC and SMA activation that was not sustained in later regulatory phases. Response profiles in the inferior occipital gyrus in SZ showed abnormal activation in the later phases of regulation. BD-patients showed general blunted responsivity in these regions.

conclusionsThese results suggest that ER-disturbances in SZ are characterized by an inefficient initialization and failure to sustain regulatory control, whereas in BD, a failure to recruit regulatory resources may represent initial deficits in formulating adequate representations of the regulatory needs. This may help to further understand how ER-disturbances give rise to symptomatology of BD and SZ.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationAdultBipolar DisorderCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexSchizophreniaYoung AdultBipolar disordercognitive reappraisalemotion regulationfinite impulse response modelingprefrontal cortexschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30773147
PMCPMC7025159
OpenAlexW2917525535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.