Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30772400›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Hierarchical complexity of the adult human structural connectome.

Keith Smith, Mark E Bastin, Simon R Cox, Maria C Valdés Hernández, Stewart Wiseman, Javier Escudero, Catherine Sudlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Connectomic Hypothesis for the Hominization of the Brain.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021
    Article
  9. Hierarchical Complexity of the Macro-Scale Neonatal Brain.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Normalised degree variance.Applied network science · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keith SmithUsher Institute for Population Health Science and Informatics, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK. Electronic address: k.smith@ed.ac.uk.
Mark E BastinCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK; Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.
Simon R CoxCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.
Maria C Valdés HernándezCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK; Row Fogo Centre into Ageing and the Brain, Edinburgh Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.
Stewart WisemanCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
Javier EscuderoSchool of Engineering, Institute for Digital Communications, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FB, UK.
Catherine SudlowUsher Institute for Population Health Science and Informatics, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK.

Funding

MRI+DTI-Based Tools for Analyzing White Matter VariationR01EB004155 · NIBIB · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI LAIDLAW, DAVID H · 2005 to 2008
$2.0M
Medical Research Council G0701120Medical Research Council G1001245Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Medical Research Council MR/M013111/1Medical Research Council MR/R024065/1Medical Research Council MR/S004122/1NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB004155Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural network of the human brain has a rich topology which many have sought to characterise using standard network science measures and concepts. However, this characterisation remains incomplete and the non-obvious features of this topology have largely confounded attempts towards comprehensive constructive modelling. This calls for new perspectives. Hierarchical complexity is an emerging paradigm of complex network topology based on the observation that complex systems are composed of hierarchies within which the roles of hierarchically equivalent nodes display highly variable connectivity patterns. Here we test the hierarchical complexity of the human structural connectomes of a group of seventy-nine healthy adults. Binary connectomes are found to be more hierarchically complex than three benchmark random network models. This provides a new key description of brain structure, revealing a rich diversity of connectivity patterns within hierarchically equivalent nodes. Dividing the connectomes into four tiers based on degree magnitudes indicates that the most complex nodes are neither those with the highest nor lowest degrees but are instead found in the middle tiers. Spatial mapping of the brain regions in each hierarchical tier reveals consistency with the current anatomical, functional and neuropsychological knowledge of the human brain. The most complex tier (Tier 3) involves regions believed to bridge high-order cognitive (Tier 1) and low-order sensorimotor processing (Tier 2). We then show that such diversity of connectivity patterns aligns with the diversity of functional roles played out across the brain, demonstrating that hierarchical complexity can characterise functional diversity strictly from the network topology.

Indexed as

AdultBrainConnectomeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetNeural PathwaysBrain networksHierarchical complexityHuman structural connectomeMRI

Identifiers

PMID30772400
PMCPMC6503942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.