Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30772387›Full record

ArticleChest2019

Predicting Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The REVEAL Risk Score Calculator 2.0 and Comparison With ESC/ERS-Based Risk Assessment Strategies.

Raymond L Benza, Mardi Gomberg-Maitland, C Greg Elliott, Harrison W Farber, Aimee J Foreman, Adaani E Frost, Michael D McGoon, David J Pasta, Mona Selej, Charles D Burger and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00370214 (REVEAL Registry™), which is not on this map. Cited by 360 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
360citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00370214 completednot on this map

REVEAL Registry™: Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management

TypeobservationalSponsorActelionRan2006 to 2012Enrolled3,515ConditionsPulmonary Hypertension
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

360 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. International Liver Transplantation Society practice guideline update on portopulmonary hypertension.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

300 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Raymond L BenzaAllegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: Raymond.Benza@ahn.org.
Mardi Gomberg-MaitlandGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC.
C Greg ElliottIntermountain Medical Center and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Harrison W FarberTufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Aimee J ForemanICON Clinical Research, San Francisco, CA.
Adaani E FrostHouston Methodist Hospital Lung Center, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX.
Michael D McGoonMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
David J PastaICON Clinical Research, San Francisco, CA.
Mona SelejActelion Pharmaceuticals US Inc., South San Francisco, CA.
Charles D BurgerMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Robert P FrantzMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive, fatal disease. Published treatment guidelines recommend treatment escalation on the basis of regular patient assessment with the goal of achieving or maintaining low-risk status. Various strategies are available to determine risk status. This analysis describes an update of the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk calculator (REVEAL 2.0) and compares it with recently published European Society of Cardiology/Respiratory Society guideline-derived risk assessment strategies.

methodsA subpopulation from the US-based registry REVEAL that survived ≥ 1 year postenrollment (baseline for this cohort) was analyzed. For REVEAL 2.0, point values and cutpoints were reassessed, and new variables were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival at 12 months postbaseline; discrimination was quantified using the c-statistic. Mortality estimates and discrimination were compared between REVEAL 2.0 and Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) and French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (FPHR) risk assessment strategies. For this comparison, a three-category REVEAL 2.0 score was computed in which patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk.

resultsREVEAL 2.0 demonstrated similar discrimination as the original calculator in this subpopulation (c-statistic = 0.76 vs 0.74), provided excellent separation of risk among the risk categories, and predicted clinical worsening as well as mortality in patients who were followed ≥ 1 year. The REVEAL 2.0 three-category score had greater discrimination (c-statistic = 0.73) than COMPERA (c-statistic = 0.62) or FPHR (c-statistic = 0.64). Compared with REVEAL 2.0, COMPERA and FPHR both underestimated and overestimated risk.

conclusionsREVEAL 2.0 demonstrates greater risk discrimination than the COMPERA and FPHR risk assessment strategies in patients enrolled in REVEAL. After external validation, the REVEAL 2.0 calculator can assist clinicians and patients in making informed treatment decisions on the basis of individual risk profiles. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPulmonary Arterial HypertensionRegistriesRisk AssessmentSurvival RateESC/ERS-derived risk assessmentpulmonary arterial hypertensionregistryREVEALrisk score calculator

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.