ArticleChest2019
Predicting Survival in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The REVEAL Risk Score Calculator 2.0 and Comparison With ESC/ERS-Based Risk Assessment Strategies.
Article in Chest, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00370214 (REVEAL Registry™), which is not on this map. Cited by 360 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
REVEAL Registry™: Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management
Who cites it
360 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- International Liver Transplantation Society practice guideline update on portopulmonary hypertension.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2026Guideline
- Impact of BMPR2 mutation on the severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Respiratory research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of prostacyclin therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Survival, morbidity, and quality of life in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients: a systematic review of outcomes reported by population-based observational studies.Respiratory research · 2024Pooled it
- How severity and classification of pulmonary hypertension affect pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and timeline.International journal of obstetric anesthesia · 2024Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of Serial Risk Stratification in Adult and Pediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Is low-risk status a surrogate outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension? An analysis of three randomised trials.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of echocardiography in pulmonary hypertension: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Heterogeneity of treatment effects by risk in pulmonary arterial hypertension.The European respiratory journal · 2023Pooled it
- Evolving profile and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension undergoing lung transplantation.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Cause-specific outcomes in systemic sclerosis-associated, systemic lupus erythematosus-associated, and idiopathic pulmonary hypertension with significant pre-capillary components: a competing risk analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Identifying a Cardio-Hepatic Phenotype by Integrating the Albumin-Bilirubin Score Into Risk Assessment in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Beyond the Heart-Lung Axis: A Review of the Crosstalk Between the Hemodynamic, Neurohormonal, and Immune Systems in Pulmonary Hypertension.Comprehensive physiology · 2026Review
- Characteristics of Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Selexipag in the SPHERE Registry by Race and Ethnicity.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Observational
- Review
- Use of Anticoagulants as a Supportive Measure in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Narrative Review.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Article
- Factors influencing treatment decisions in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Exercise testing for evaluating right ventricular (RV) function in pulmonary hypertension - A review.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- Registry-based estimation of cardiac event-free survival in congenital heart disease complicated by pulmonary hypertension: A nationwide registry study from Japan.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Refining the Definition for "Low Risk" in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Time to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality.JACC. Heart failure · 2026Article
300 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive, fatal disease. Published treatment guidelines recommend treatment escalation on the basis of regular patient assessment with the goal of achieving or maintaining low-risk status. Various strategies are available to determine risk status. This analysis describes an update of the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) risk calculator (REVEAL 2.0) and compares it with recently published European Society of Cardiology/Respiratory Society guideline-derived risk assessment strategies.
methodsA subpopulation from the US-based registry REVEAL that survived ≥ 1 year postenrollment (baseline for this cohort) was analyzed. For REVEAL 2.0, point values and cutpoints were reassessed, and new variables were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival at 12 months postbaseline; discrimination was quantified using the c-statistic. Mortality estimates and discrimination were compared between REVEAL 2.0 and Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) and French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry (FPHR) risk assessment strategies. For this comparison, a three-category REVEAL 2.0 score was computed in which patients were classified as low-, intermediate-, or high-risk.
resultsREVEAL 2.0 demonstrated similar discrimination as the original calculator in this subpopulation (c-statistic = 0.76 vs 0.74), provided excellent separation of risk among the risk categories, and predicted clinical worsening as well as mortality in patients who were followed ≥ 1 year. The REVEAL 2.0 three-category score had greater discrimination (c-statistic = 0.73) than COMPERA (c-statistic = 0.62) or FPHR (c-statistic = 0.64). Compared with REVEAL 2.0, COMPERA and FPHR both underestimated and overestimated risk.
conclusionsREVEAL 2.0 demonstrates greater risk discrimination than the COMPERA and FPHR risk assessment strategies in patients enrolled in REVEAL. After external validation, the REVEAL 2.0 calculator can assist clinicians and patients in making informed treatment decisions on the basis of individual risk profiles. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT00370214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30772387What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.