Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30772370›Full record

Trial reportPreventive medicine2019

How should sugar-sweetened beverage health warnings be designed? A randomized experiment.

Anna H Grummon, Marissa G Hall, Lindsey Smith Taillie, Noel T Brewer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05038163 (Are Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Information Labels Well-Targeted), which is not on this map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05038163 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Are Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Information Labels Well-Targeted: Evidence and Welfare Implications

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Ran2021 to 2021Enrolled5,845ConditionsSoft Drink Consumption, Sugar-sweetened Beverages, Information LabelsArmsNutrition Facts, Text Warning, Graphic Warning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Exploring the Potential for Graphic Warning Labels to Reduce Intentions to Consume Energy Drinks.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Online RCT of Icon Added-Sugar Warning Labels for Restaurant Menus.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023
    Trial
  15. A randomised experimental study comparing perceptions of two energy drink health warning labels.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna H GrummonDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: agrummon@unc.edu.
Marissa G HallDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Lindsey Smith TaillieCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Noel T BrewerDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Training & Education Program p294-308P50CA180907 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RIBISL, KURT M. · 2013 to 2017
$20.2M
POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180907NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health warnings are a promising strategy for reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), but uncertainty remains about how to design warnings to maximize their impact. Warnings already implemented in Latin America use nutrient disclosures, while proposed U.S. warnings would describe the health effects of consuming SSBs. We sought to determine whether warning characteristics influence consumers' reactions to SSB health warnings. A national convenience sample of U.S. adults (n = 1360) completed an online survey in 2018. In a factorial design, we randomly assigned participants to view SSB health warnings that differed in: 1) inclusion of health effects ("Drinking beverages with added sugar contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay"); 2) inclusion of a nutrient disclosure ("High in added sugar"); 3) inclusion of the marker word "WARNING;" and 4) shape (octagon vs. rectangle). The primary outcome was perceived message effectiveness (PME, range 1-5). PME was higher for warnings that included health effects (average differential effect [ADE] = 0.63, p < 0.001) or nutrient disclosures (ADE = 0.32, p < 0.001) compared to warnings without this information. However, adding a nutrient disclosure to a warning that already included health effects did not lead to higher PME compared to warnings with health effects alone. The marker "WARNING" (ADE = 0.21) and the octagon shape (ADE = 0.08) also led to higher PME compared to warnings without these characteristics (ps < 0.001). The same pattern of results held for the secondary outcomes, fear and thinking about harms. SSB health warnings may have more impact if they describe health effects, use the marker "WARNING," and are octagon-shaped.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSugar-Sweetened BeveragesAdultFemaleFood LabelingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrientsObesitySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesNutrientsFront of package labelsHealth communicationHealth warningsNutritionObesity preventionSugar-sweetened beveragesWarnings labels

Identifiers

PMID30772370
PMCPMC6520104
OpenAlexW2914927250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.