Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30772298›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2019

A Group Randomized Intervention Trial Increases Participation in the School Breakfast Program in 16 Rural High Schools in Minnesota.

Marilyn S Nanney, Robert Leduc, Mary Hearst, Amy Shanafelt, Qi Wang, Mary Schroeder, Katherine Y Grannon, Martha Y Kubik, Caitlin Caspi, Lisa J Harnack

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 12 to 18 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marilyn S Nanney
Robert Leduc
Mary Hearst
Amy Shanafelt
Qi Wang
Mary Schroeder
Katherine Y Grannon
Martha Y Kubik
Caitlin Caspi
Lisa J Harnack
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Improving High School Breakfast EnvironmentsR01HL113235 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BERGE, JERICA M · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreakfast consumption is associated with better diet quality and healthier weights, yet many adolescents miss breakfast. Nationally, 17.1% of students participate in the School Breakfast Program (SBP). Only 10% of high school students participate.

objectiveOur aim was to evaluate an environmental intervention to increase SBP participation in high schools.

designA group randomized trial was carried out from 2012 to 2015. PARTICIPANTS/

settingNinth- and 10th-grade students enrolled in 16 rural schools in Minnesota (median 387 students) were randomized to intervention or control condition.

interventionA school-based intervention that included two key components was implemented over a 12-month period. One component focused on increasing SBP participation by increasing student access to school breakfast through changes in school breakfast service practices (eg, serving breakfast from a grab-n-go cart in the atrium; expanding breakfast service times). The other component focused on promoting school breakfast through student-directed marketing campaigns.

main outcome measureChange in school-level participation in the SBP was assessed between baseline (among ninth and tenth graders) and follow-up (among tenth and eleventh graders). School meal and attendance records were used to assess change in school-level participation rates in the SBP. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: The Wilcoxon test was used for analysis of difference in change in mean SBP participation rate by experimental group.

resultsThe median change in SBP participation rate between baseline and follow-up was 3% (interquartile range=13.5%) among the eight schools in the intervention group and 0.5% (interquartile range=0.7%) among the eight schools in the control group. This difference in change between groups was statistically significant (Wilcoxon test, P=0.03). The intervention effect increased throughout the intervention period, with change in mean SBP participation rate by the end of the school year reaching 10.3% (95% CI 3.0 to 17.6). However, among the intervention schools, the change in mean SBP participation rates was highly variable (range=-0.8% to 24.8%).

conclusionsInterventions designed to improve access to the SBP by reducing environmental and social barriers have potential to increase participation among high school students.

Indexed as

Food ServicesSchool Health ServicesAdolescentBreakfastCommunity ParticipationFemaleHumansMaleMarketingMinnesotaProgram EvaluationRural PopulationStudentsAdolescentsHigh schoolRuralSchool breakfast program participation

Identifiers

PMID30772298
PMCPMC6536323
OpenAlexW2911234729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.