ArticleThe Knee2019
Clinical measures associated with knee function over two years in young athletes after ACL reconstruction.
Article in The Knee, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Return to sports WeChat applet for evaluating the rehabilitation effects after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Trial
- Long-Term Efficacy of Carboxymethyl-Chitosan in Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis: A Twelve-Month Follow-Up Study on Non-Responders to Hyaluronic Acid.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Standardizing and Classifying Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: An International Multicenter Study Using a Mobile Application.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with suture tape augmentation in the high-risk, young population.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Comparison of Step-Based Metrics Under Laboratory and Free-Living Conditions in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- Assessing the Relationship of Psychological Sport Readiness, Single-leg Vertical Jump, and Non-Sagittal Single-Leg Hops to Quadriceps Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2024Article
- Clinical, Biomechanical, and Self-reported Health Status After ACL Reconstruction With Meniscal Repair in Soccer Players: Results at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Demographic and Clinical Correlates of Device-Measured Physical Activity Levels in Individuals with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023Article
- Article
- Limited evidence for return to sport testing after ACL reconstruction in children and adolescents under 16 years: a scoping review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate how patient-reported knee function changed over a two-year period in young athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and return-to-sport (RTS), and to determine the impact of clinical measures, after controlling for demographic and surgical covariates.
methodsAt the time of RTS after primary, unilateral ACLR, the following data were collected in 67 young athletes: Quadriceps (QF), hamstring (HS), and hip abduction (HA) strength; knee range-of-motion, effusion, and anterior laxity; and patient-reported function using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). At two years post-RTS, patient-reported function was reevaluated using the KOOS. Absolute KOOS scores and proportions of participants meeting functional recovery cutoffs were compared between time-points. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine clinical measures at RTS associated with two-year post-RTS KOOS scores.
resultsKOOS scores for all subscales were higher at two years post-RTS (all p < 0.003), and the proportions of participants demonstrating functional recovery were higher at two years post-RTS for the KOOS-Symptoms, KOOS-Sport, KOOS-QOL, and all KOOS subscales combined (all p < 0.03). After controlling for graft type, clinical measures at RTS associated with higher two-year post-RTS KOOS scores were: KOOS-Pain (lower HA peak torque); KOOS-Symptoms (higher QF strength symmetry and higher QF peak torque); and KOOS-ADL (lower HA peak torque).
conclusionsIn this cohort, after controlling for graft type, higher QF strength symmetry, higher involved-limb QF peak torque, and lower involved-limb HA peak torque from the time of RTS were associated with higher function at two years post-RTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.