Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771535›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2019

Advances in immunotherapy delivery from implantable and injectable biomaterials.

David G Leach, Simon Young, Jeffrey D Hartgerink

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pioneering biomimetic biomaterial for leukemia therapy enhancement: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Immunotherapies for locally aggressive cancers.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Porous Hydrogels for Immunomodulatory Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David G LeachDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States.
Simon YoungDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77054, United States.
Jeffrey D HartgerinkDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, United States. Electronic address: jdh@rice.edu.

Funding

Self-assembling Peptide Nanofiber Hydrogels for Nerve RegenerationR01DE021798 · NIDCR · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI HARTGERINK, JEFFREY DALE · 2012 to 2021
$3.7M
Autophagy-promoting NLRX1-TUFM complex and cancer cell resistance to cetuximabR00DE024173 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LEI, YU LEO · 2016 to 2018
$863k
The Use of Novel Implantable Cancer Vaccines for the Treatment of Oral CancerR00DE023577 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI YOUNG, SIMON · 2015 to 2017
$747k
STINGel Immunotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Head and Neck CancerR21DE027794 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI YOUNG, SIMON · 2018 to 2019
$440k
Autophagy-promoting NLRX1-TUFM complex and cancer cell resistance to cetuximabK99DE024173 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEI, YU LEO · 2014 to 2015
$254k
The Use of Novel Implantable Cancer Vaccines for the Treatment of Oral CancerK99DE023577 · NIDCR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI YOUNG, SIMON · 2013 to 2014
$213k
NIDCR NIH HHS K99 DE023577NIDCR NIH HHS K99 DE024173NIDCR NIH HHS R00 DE023577NIDCR NIH HHS R00 DE024173NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021798NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE027794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroscale biomaterials, such as preformed implantable scaffolds and injectable soft materials, possess powerful synergies with anti-cancer immunotherapies. Immunotherapies on their own typically have poor delivery properties, and often require repeated high-dose injections that result in serious off-tumor effects and/or limited efficacy. Rationally designed biomaterials allow for discrete localization and controlled release of immunotherapeutic agents, and have been shown in a large number of applications to improve outcomes in the treatment of cancers via immunotherapy. Among various strategies, macroscale biomaterial delivery systems can take the form of robust tablet-like scaffolds that are surgically implanted into a tumor resection site, releasing programmed immune cells or immunoregulatory agents. Alternatively they can be developed as soft gel-like materials that are injected into solid tumors or sites of resection to stimulate a potent anti-tumor immune response. Biomaterials synthesized from diverse components such as polymers and peptides can be combined with any immunotherapy in the modern toolbox, from checkpoint inhibitors and stimulatory adjuvants, to cancer antigens and adoptive T cells, resulting in unique synergies and improved therapeutic efficacy. The field is growing rapidly in size as publications continue to appear in the literature, and biomaterial-based immunotherapies are entering clinical trials and human patients. It is unarguably an exciting time for cancer immunotherapy and biomaterial researchers, and further work seeks to understand the most critical design considerations in the development of the next-generation of immunotherapeutic biomaterials. This review will discuss recent advances in the delivery of immunotherapies from localized biomaterials, focusing on macroscale implantable and injectable systems. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Anti-cancer immunotherapies have shown exciting clinical results in the past few decades, yet they suffer from a few distinct limitations, such as poor delivery kinetics, narrow patient response profiles, and systemic side effects. Biomaterial systems are now being developed that can overcome many of these problems, allowing for localized adjuvant delivery, focused dose concentrations, and extended therapy presentation. The field of biocompatible carrier materials is uniquely suited to be combined with immunotherapy, promising to yield significant improvements in treatment outcomes and clinical care. In this review, the first pioneering efforts and most recent advances in biomaterials for immunotherapeutic applications are explored, with a specific focus on implantable and injectable biomaterials such as porous scaffolds, cryogels, and hydrogels.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyBiocompatible MaterialsDrug ImplantsHumansHydrogelsImmunologic FactorsNeoplasmsBiocompatible MaterialsDrug ImplantsHydrogelsImmunologic FactorsBiomaterialsCancerImmunotherapyLocalized delivery

Identifiers

PMID30771535
PMCPMC6632081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.