Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771346›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2019

Development and validation of a risk-calculator for adverse perioperative outcomes for women with ovarian cancer.

Stephanie Cham, Ling Chen, Caryn M St Clair, June Y Hou, Ana I Tergas, Alexander Melamed, Cande V Ananth, Alfred I Neugut, Dawn L Hershman, Jason D Wright

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Validation of a risk-based algorithm to reduce poor operative outcomes after complex surgery for ovarian cancer.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie ChamColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Ling ChenColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Caryn M St ClairColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
June Y HouColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Ana I TergasColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Alexander MelamedMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Cande V AnanthJoseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Alfred I NeugutColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Dawn L HershmanColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Jason D WrightColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY; New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. Electronic address: jw2459@columbia.edu.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USColumbia University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

The Influence of Hospital Variability on the Management of Cancer-Associated CompR01CA169121 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WRIGHT, JASON · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary cytoreduction followed by platinum-based chemotherapy is the primary treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking is an alternative option, particularly in those who may be poor surgical candidates.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine factors associated with short-term, significant perioperative morbidity and mortality for women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer and to create a nomogram to predict the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes. STUDY

designWe used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who underwent surgery from 2011 to 2015. Demographic factors, clinical characteristics, comorbidity, functional status, and the extent of surgery were used to predict the risk of severe perioperative complications or death using multivariable models. Multiple imputation methods were employed for missing data. A nomogram was developed based on the final model. The discrimination ability of the model was assessed with a calibration plot and discrimination concordance index.

resultsWe identified a total of 7029 patients. Overall, 5.8% of patients experienced a Clavien-Dindo IV complication, 9.8% of patients were readmitted, 3.0% of patients required a reoperation, and 0.9% of patients died within 30 days. Among the baseline variables assessed, increasing age, emergent surgery, ascites, bleeding disorder, low albumin, higher American Society of Anesthesiology classification score, and a higher extended procedure score were associated with serious perioperative morbidity or mortality. Of these factors, performance of ≥3 cytoreductive procedures (adjusted odds ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval 3.01-6.82), American Society of Anesthesiology classification score ≥ class 4 (adjusted odds ratio 2.89, 95% confidence interval 1.17-7.14), bleeding disorder (adjusted odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.82-4.10), and age ≥80 years (adjusted odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval 1.66-3.63) were most strongly associated with risk of an event. The final nomogram included the above variables and had an internal discrimination concordance index of 0.71, with accurate predictions in an internal validation set, indicating a 71% correct identification of patients across all possible pairs.

conclusionWomen undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer are at significant risk for the occurrence of adverse perioperative outcomes. Using readily identifiable characteristics, this nomogram can predict adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAscitesBlood Coagulation DisordersCarcinomaChemotherapy, AdjuvantComorbidityCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDiaphragmDigestive System Surgical ProceduresEmergenciesFallopian Tube NeoplasmsFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHeart Arrestcomplicationcytoreductiondebulkingovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID30771346
PMCPMC6545148
OpenAlexW2911887248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.