Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771264›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2019

Habituation and novelty detection fNIRS brain responses in 5- and 8-month-old infants: The Gambia and UK.

Sarah Lloyd-Fox, Anna Blasi, Samantha McCann, Maria Rozhko, Laura Katus, Luke Mason, Topun Austin, Sophie E Moore, Clare E Elwell, BRIGHT project team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah Lloyd-FoxCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6742-9889
Anna BlasiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Samantha McCannMedical Research Council, The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Maria RozhkoDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Laura KatusGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Luke MasonCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck University of London, London, UK.
Topun AustinDepartment of Neonatology, The Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Sophie E MooreDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Kings College London, London, UK.
Clare E ElwellDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
BRIGHT project team

Funding

Medical Research Council G0300025Medical Research Council G0400120Medical Research Council G0701458Medical Research Council MC_U123292701Medical Research Council MC_UP_1005/1Medical Research Council MR/P012019/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first 1,000 days of life are a critical window of vulnerability to exposure to socioeconomic and health challenges (i.e. poverty/undernutrition). The Brain Imaging for Global Health (BRIGHT) project has been established to deliver longitudinal measures of brain development from 0 to 24 months in UK and Gambian infants and to assess the impact of early adversity. Here results from the Habituation-Novelty Detection (HaND) functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) task at 5 and 8 months are presented (N = 62 UK; N = 115 Gambia). In the UK cohort distinct patterns of habituation and recovery of response to novelty are seen, becoming more robust from 5 to 8 months of age. In The Gambia, an attenuated habituation response is evident: a larger number of trials are required before the response sufficiently suppresses relative to the response during the first presented trials. Furthermore, recovery of response to novelty is not evident at 5 or 8 months of age. As this longitudinal study continues in The Gambia, the parallel collection of socioeconomic, caregiving, health and nutrition data will allow us to stratify how individual trajectories of habituation and recovery of response to novelty associate with different risk factors and adaptive mechanisms in greater depth. Given the increasing interest in the use of neuroimaging methods within global neurocognitive developmental studies, this study provides a novel cross-culturally appropriate paradigm for the study of brain responses associated with attention and learning mechanisms across early development.

Indexed as

Habituation, PsychophysiologicAttentionBrainFemaleGambiaHumansInfantLearningLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuroimagingSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30771264
PMCPMC6767511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.