Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771246›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2019

Long-term follow-up of a multicentre cohort study on laparoscopic peritoneal lavage for perforated diverticulitis.

D Sneiders, D P V Lambrichts, H A Swank, C F J M Blanken-Peeters, S W Nienhuijs, M J P M Govaert, M F Gerhards, A G M Hoofwijk, R J I Bosker, J D W van der Bilt and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

D SneidersDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
D P V LambrichtsDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4602-3115
H A SwankDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C F J M Blanken-PeetersDepartment of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
S W NienhuijsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M J P M GovaertDepartment of Surgery, Westfriesgasthuis, Hoorn, The Netherlands.
M F GerhardsDepartment of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A G M HoofwijkDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
R J I BoskerDepartment of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands.
J D W van der BiltDepartment of Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands.
B H M HeijnenDepartment of Surgery, Lange Land Hospital, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.
H O Ten Cate HoedemakerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
G J KleinrensinkDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J F LangeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
W A BemelmanDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLFlevoziekenhuis · NLLange Land Ziekenhuis · NLOLVG · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLWestfriesgasthuis · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimLaparoscopic peritoneal lavage has increasingly been investigated as a promising alternative to sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis. Most studies only reported outcomes up to 12 months. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of patients treated with laparoscopic lavage.

methodsBetween 2008 and 2010, 38 patients treated with laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in 10 Dutch teaching hospitals were included. Long-term follow-up data on patient outcomes, e.g. diverticulitis recurrence, reoperations and readmissions, were collected retrospectively. The characteristics of patients with recurrent diverticulitis or complications requiring surgery or leading to death, categorized as 'overall complicated outcome', were compared with patients who developed no complications or complications not requiring surgery.

resultsThe median follow-up was 46 months (interquartile range 7-77), during which 17 episodes of recurrent diverticulitis (seven complicated) in 12 patients (32%) occurred. Twelve patients (32%) required additional surgery with a total of 29 procedures. Fifteen patients (39%) had a total of 50 readmissions. Of initially successfully treated patients (n = 31), 12 (31%) had recurrent diverticulitis or other complications. At 90 days, 32 (84%) patients were alive without undergoing a sigmoidectomy. However, seven (22%) of these patients eventually had a sigmoidectomy after 90 days. Diverticulitis-related events occurred up to 6 years after the index procedure.

conclusionLong-term diverticulitis recurrence, re-intervention and readmission rates after laparoscopic lavage were high. A complicated outcome was also seen in patients who had initially been treated successfully with laparoscopic lavage with relevant events occurring up to 6 years after initial surgery.

Indexed as

AgedDiverticulitisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntestinal PerforationLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPeritoneal LavagePeritonitisRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopic lavagelong-term follow-upperforated diverticulitis

Identifiers

PMID30771246
PMCPMC6850083
OpenAlexW2913018359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.