ArticleCancer science2019
Enrichment of CLDN18-ARHGAP fusion gene in gastric cancers in young adults.
Article in Cancer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histological and mutational profile of diffuse gastric cancer: current knowledge and future challenges.Molecular oncology · 2021Pooled it
- The Significance of theFrontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- CLDN18.2 in Gastric Cancer: Current Therapeutic Landscape and Future Perspectives.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Evaluation of ARHGAP26 expression, prognostic significance, and immune infiltration in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Claudin18.2 expression and its clinicopathological feature in adenocarcinoma from various parts.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Correlation and Overlap Between Claudin 18.2 and FGFR2b Overexpression: A Tissue Microarray Study With 1,538 Gastric Carcinomas.Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Article
- The prognostic role of Claudin 18.2 in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic literature review.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Therapeutic strategy for scirrhous type gastric cancer.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Understanding the Role of Rho GTPase Activating Protein and Bone Marrow Kinase X: A Novel Target in Gastric Cancer Treatment.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Review
- Emerging evidence of targeting non-oncogenic drivers for gastric cancer: Claudin18.2 and beyond.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- Survival outcomes of patients with gastric cancer treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy based on claudin 18.2 expression.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025Article
- Tight junctional protein family, Claudins in cancer and cancer metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Claudin 1, 4, 6 and 18 isoform 2 as targets for the treatment of cancer (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Diffuse Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Molecular Features and Emerging Therapeutics.Targeted oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Early gastric cancer with RhoGAP fusion is linked to frequent nodal metastasis and a part of microtubular-mucocellular histology.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024Article
- Progress of Clinical Studies Targeting Claudin18.2 for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Review
- Mutation characteristics and molecular evolution of ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer and potential biomarkers for paclitaxel treatment.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Claudin 18.2 as a novel therapeutic target.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Expression and Targeted Application of Claudins Family in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer in young adults has been pointed out to comprise a subgroup associated with distinctive clinicopathological features, including an equal gender distribution, advanced disease, and diffuse-type histology. Comprehensive molecular analyses of gastric cancers have led to molecular-based classifications and to specific and effective treatment options. The molecular traits of gastric cancers in young adults await investigations, which should provide a clue to explore therapeutic strategies. Here, we studied 146 gastric cancer patients diagnosed at the age of 40 years or younger at the Cancer Institute Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). Tumor specimens were examined for Helicobacter pylori infection, Epstein-Barr virus positivity, and for the expression of mismatch repair genes to indicate microsatellite instability. Overexpression, gene amplifications, and rearrangements of 18 candidate driver genes were examined by immunohistochemistry and FISH. Although only a small number of cases were positive for Epstein-Barr virus and microsatellite instability (n = 2 each), we repeatedly found tumors with gene fusion between a tight-junction protein claudin, CLDN18, and a regulator of small G proteins, ARHGAP, in as many as 22 cases (15.1%), and RNA sequencing identified 2 novel types of the fusion. Notably, patients with the CLDN18-ARHGAP fusion revealed associations between aggressive disease and poor prognosis, even when grouped by their clinical stage. These observations indicate that a fusion gene between CLDN18 and ARHGAP is enriched in younger age-onset gastric cancers, and its presence could contribute to their aggressive characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.