Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771238›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2019

Safety and Efficacy of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy for Up to Thirteen Years in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Daniel J Wallace, Ellen M Ginzler, Joan T Merrill, Richard A Furie, William Stohl, W Winn Chatham, Arthur Weinstein, James D McKay, W Joseph McCune, Michelle Petri and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Belimumab for systemic lupus erythematosus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daniel J WallaceCedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles.
Ellen M GinzlerState University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn.ORCID 0000-0002-7306-7375
Joan T MerrillOklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City.
Richard A FurieNorthwell Health, Great Neck, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6712-1585
William StohlUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles.ORCID 0000-0002-8272-7873
W Winn ChathamUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham.
Arthur WeinsteinGeorgetown University, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-6623
James D McKayOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa.
W Joseph McCuneUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Michelle PetriJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-1441-5373
James FettiplaceGlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9699-9757
David A RothGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-8356-0457
Beulah JiGlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9944-348X
Amy HeathGlaxoSmithKline, Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
GSKHuman Genome SciencesNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) belimumab plus standard of care (SOC) therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE.

methodsThe study was designed as a multicenter, open-label, continuation study of IV belimumab given every 4 weeks in conjunction with SOC therapy in patients with SLE who completed a phase II, double-blind study. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory data were monitored from the first belimumab dose (in either study) until 24 weeks after the final dose. Efficacy assessments included SLE Responder Index (SRI) and flare index scores (each assessed at 16-week intervals) and glucocorticoid use (assessed at 4-week intervals).

resultsOf the 476 patients in the parent study, 298 (62.6%) entered the continuation study, of whom 96 (32.2%) remained in the study. Patients received belimumab for up to 13 years (median duration of exposure 3,334.0 days [range 260-4,332 days], total belimumab exposure 2,294 patient-years, median number of infusions 115.5 [range 7-155]). The percentage of patients with AEs each year remained stable or decreased. Normal serum IgG levels were maintained in the majority of patients over the study, and the rate of infections remained stable. The percentage of patients who achieved an SRI response increased from 32.8% (year 1) to 75.6% of those remaining on treatment at year 12. The glucocorticoid dose was decreased in patients who had been receiving >7.5 mg/day at baseline.

conclusionThis study is the longest to date to assess belimumab treatment in patients with SLE in clinical trials. Belimumab was well tolerated with no new safety concerns, and efficacy was maintained in patients who continued the study. For patients who initially exhibited a satisfactory response to belimumab, the treatment continues to be well tolerated and provides long-term disease control.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDrug Therapy, CombinationDuration of TherapyFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfectionsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsStandard of CareTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbelimumabGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID30771238
PMCPMC6617785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.