Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771237›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2019

Development and Validation of an

Sang Jin Lee, Ju Hye Jeong, Chang-Hee Lee, Byeong-Cheol Ahn, Jung Su Eun, Na Ri Kim, Jong Whan Kang, Eon Jeong Nam, Young Mo Kang

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The EANM guideline for radiosynoviorthesis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ArticularThe Journal of rheumatology · 2022
    Article
  9. Total-BodyJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dissociation between 2-[BMC rheumatology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evolving Use of Molecular Imaging in Research and in Practice.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sang Jin LeeKyungpook National University Hospital and Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Ju Hye JeongKyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Hee LeeKyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Byeong-Cheol AhnKyungpook National University Hospital and Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jung Su EunKyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Na Ri KimKyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jong Whan KangKyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Eon Jeong NamKyungpook National University Hospital and Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Young Mo KangKyungpook National University Hospital and Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare of the Republic of Korea HI18C2112National Research Foundation 2017R1A2B2008288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinical joint count assessment is important for detecting synovitis but its reliability is a subject of controversy. This study was undertaken to assess the correlation of positron emission tomography (PET)-derived parameters in 68 joints with disease activity and to compare the reliability of joint counts between PET with computed tomography (CT) and clinical assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsWe enrolled 91 patients with active RA (69 in a development group and 22 in a validation group) who underwent concurrent

resultsThe number of PET-positive joints (of 28 and 68 joints) was significantly correlated with the swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and the DAS in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of PET for the affected joint counts were excellent. Interobserver reliability between nuclear medicine physicians and rheumatologists was good for the SJC and TJC in both 28 joints and 68 joints. After multivariate analyses, including ESR and patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) in addition to PET-derived parameters, the PET/DAS was derived as (0.063 × number of PET-positive joints in 28 joints) + (0.011 × ESR) + (0.030 × PtGA). A significant correlation between the PET/DAS and the DAS28-ESR was confirmed in the validation group (P < 0.001).

conclusionPET-CT could serve as a sensitive and reliable method in the evaluation of disease activity in RA patients, and may be applicable as a research tool, particularly in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsSeverity of Illness IndexAgedArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansJointsMaleMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyReproducibility of ResultsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID30771237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.