Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771198›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2019

A centromere satellite concomitant with extensive karyotypic diversity across the Peromyscus genus defies predictions of molecular drive.

Brendan M Smalec, Thomas N Heider, Brianna L Flynn, Rachel J O'Neill

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Meiosis-specific decoupling of the pericentromere from the kinetochore.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Comparative analysis of repetitive DNA in dysploid and non-dysploid Phaseolus beans.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brendan M SmalecInstitute for Systems Genomics and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, 67 North Eagleville Road, Unit 3127, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Thomas N HeiderInstitute for Systems Genomics and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, 67 North Eagleville Road, Unit 3127, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Brianna L FlynnInstitute for Systems Genomics and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, 67 North Eagleville Road, Unit 3127, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Rachel J O'NeillInstitute for Systems Genomics and Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, 67 North Eagleville Road, Unit 3127, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA. rachel.oneill@uconn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1525-6821
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common feature of eukaryotic centromeres is the presence of large tracts of tandemly arranged repeats, known as satellite DNA. However, these centromeric repeats appear to experience rapid evolution under forces such as molecular drive and centromere drive, seemingly without consequence to the integrity of the centromere. Moreover, blocks of heterochromatin within the karyotype, including the centromere, are hotspots for chromosome rearrangements that may drive speciation events by contributing to reproductive isolation. However, the relationship between the evolution of heterochromatic sequences and the karyotypic dynamics of these regions remains largely unknown. Here, we show that a single conserved satellite DNA sequence in the order Rodentia of the genus Peromyscus localizes to recurrent sites of chromosome rearrangements and heterochromatic amplifications. Peromyscine species display several unique features of chromosome evolution compared to other Rodentia, including stable maintenance of a strict chromosome number of 48 among all known species in the absence of any detectable interchromosomal rearrangements. Rather, the diverse karyotypes of Peromyscine species are due to intrachromosomal variation in blocks of repeated DNA content. Despite wide variation in the copy number and location of repeat blocks among different species, we find that a single satellite monomer maintains a conserved sequence and homogenized tandem repeat structure, defying predictions of molecular drive. The conservation of this satellite monomer results in common, abundant, and large blocks of chromatin that are homologous among chromosomes within one species and among diverged species. Thus, such a conserved repeat may have facilitated the retention of polymorphic chromosome variants within individuals and intrachromosomal rearrangements between species-both factors that have previously been hypothesized to contribute towards the extremely wide range of ecological adaptations that this genus exhibits.

Indexed as

CentromereKaryotypeAnimalsConserved SequenceDNA, SatelliteEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationHeterochromatinPeromyscusSpecies SpecificityDNA, SatelliteHeterochromatinCentromereChromosome rearrangementsConcerted evolutionMolecular drivePeromyscusSatellite DNA

Identifiers

PMID30771198
PMCPMC6733818
OpenAlexW2914044862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.