Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771036›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Impact of smoking on cardiac magnetic resonance infarct characteristics and clinical outcome in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Hans-Josef Feistritzer, Ingo Eitel, Alexander Jobs, Suzanne de Waha-Thiele, Thomas Stiermaier, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Philipp Lurz, Sebastian J Reinstadler, Martin Reindl, Gert Klug and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03516578 (Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging For Prognosis Assessment After Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03516578 completednot on this map

Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging For Prognosis Assessment After Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHeart Center Leipzig - University HospitalRan2011 to 2018Enrolled314ConditionsMyocardial InfarctionArmsCardiac magnetic resonance imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hans-Josef FeistritzerDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany. Hans-Josef.Feistritzer@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Ingo EitelDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Alexander JobsDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany.
Suzanne de Waha-ThieleDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas StiermaierDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Mohamed Abdel-WahabDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany.
Philipp LurzDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian J ReinstadlerUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Martin ReindlUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gert KlugUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard MetzlerUniversity Clinic of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Steffen DeschDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig Heart Institute · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Lübeck · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data derived from several studies suggest a better survival in smokers with acute myocardial infarction, a phenomenon referred to as the 'smoker's paradox'. We aimed to investigate the association of smoking with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging determined infarct severity and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the occurrence of death, reinfarction, and congestive heart failure at 12 months in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) reperfused by early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this multicenter, registry study 311 NSTEMI patients underwent CMR imaging 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4) days after PCI. Myocardial salvage index (MSI), infarct size (IS), and microvascular obstruction (MVO) as well as MACE rate were compared according to admission smoking status. Approximately one-third of patients were current smokers (n = 122, 39%). Smokers were significantly younger and less likely to have hypertension as compared to non-smokers (all p < 0.05). The extent of MSI (63.2, IQR 28.9-85.4 vs. 65.6, IQR 42.2-82.9, p = 0.30), and IS (7.2, IQR 2.3-15.7%LV vs. 7.0, IQR 2.2-12.4%LV, p = 0.27) did not differ significantly between smokers and non-smokers. Despite similar prevalence of MVO, MVO (%LV) was higher in smokers compared to non-smokers (2.0, IQR 0.9-4.7%LV vs. 1.2, IQR 0.7-2.2%LV, p = 0.03). MACE rates at 12 months were comparable in smokers and non-smokers (5.7% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.65). In NSTEMI patients, smoking is neither associated with increased myocardial salvage nor less severe myocardial damage. Clinical outcome at 12 months was similar in smokers and non-smokers.Trial registration NCT03516578.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSmokersAgedAge FactorsAustriaCause of DeathComorbidityDisease ProgressionFemaleGermanyHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCardiac magnetic resonance imagingNon-ST-elevation myocardial infarctionPrognosisSmoker’s paradoxSmoking

Identifiers

PMID30771036
OpenAlexW3003407310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.