Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30771021›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2019

Validation of a health screening questionnaire for primary care using Rasch models.

Jonathan David Comins, Kirsten Schierup Freund, Karl Bang Christensen, Jørgen Lous, John Brodersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan David CominsCentre of Research and Education in General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jocom@sund.ku.dk.
Kirsten Schierup FreundResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Karl Bang ChristensenDepartment of Public Health, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jørgen LousResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
John BrodersenCentre of Research and Education in General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

PLU PLU - 541305PLU PLU - FF-2-01-284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth inequality is on the rise due to various social and individual factors. While preventive health checks (PHC) aim to counteract health inequality, there is robust evidence against the use of PHC in general practice. It is unknown which factors can identify persons who will benefit from preventive interventions that are more beneficial than harmful. Hence, valid screening instruments are needed.

methodsThe aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of a screening questionnaire (SQ-33), which targets vulnerable persons in primary care practice who can benefit from preventive consultations. Survey data were acquired from 20 primary care clinical practices in the Northern Region of Jutland, Denmark. Respondents were 2056 persons between 20 and 44 years old who, for any reason, consulted their family doctor. The psychometric properties of the SQ-33 were assessed using Rasch item response modelling. Follow-up analysis was performed on a subsample of 364 persons one year subsequent to initial inclusion, in order to assess responsiveness and predictive validity using a general health anchor item.

resultsTwenty-three of the SQ-33 items in four subscales fit a Graphical loglinear Rasch model (GLLRM) at baseline and follow-up, thus confirming the scaling properties. The modified 23-item version (HSQ-23) revealed superior responsiveness and predictive validity compared with the SQ-33.

conclusionsThe Health Screening Questionnaire (HSQ-23) was shown to possess adequate psychometric properties and responsiveness and can thus be used as an outcome measure in preventive intervention studies. Future study should address whether the HSQ-23 successfully identifies patients who will benefit from PHC consultations.

Indexed as

Clinical interventionsConsultation processPreventive health checksPrimary care practicePsychometric propertiesScreening questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30771021
PMCPMC6377689
OpenAlexW2917841267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.