Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30770958›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.

Xiaoyu Tang, Yulin Gao, Weiping Yang, Yanna Ren, Jinglong Wu, Ming Zhang, Qiong Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modal-based attention modulates attentional blink.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoyu TangSchool of Psychology, Liaoning Collaborative Innovation Center of Children and Adolescents Healthy Personality Assessment and Cultivation, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China. tangyu-2006@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-8874
Yulin GaoDepartment of Psychology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130012, China.
Weiping YangDepartment of Psychology, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062, China.
Yanna RenDepartment of Psychology, Guiyang University of Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Jinglong WuCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Okayama University, Okayama, 7008530, Japan.
Ming ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China. psyzm@suda.edu.cn.
Qiong WuCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Okayama University, Okayama, 7008530, Japan. wuqiong@okayama-u.ac.jp.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 450060502081Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China 16YJC190025Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China 18XJC190003Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25249026Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25303013National Natural Science Foundation of China 31371025National Natural Science Foundation of China 31600882National Natural Science Foundation of China 31700973National Natural Science Foundation of China 31871092National Natural Science Foundation of China 61473043Young Scientists Fund 31800932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slower response to a target appearing at a previously attended location in a cue-target paradigm. It has been greatly explored in the visual or auditory modality. This study investigates differences between the IOR of audiovisual targets and the IOR of visual targets under conditions of modality-specific selective attention (Experiment 1) and divided-modalities attention (Experiment 2). We employed an exogenous spatial cueing paradigm and manipulated the modalities of targets, including visual, auditory, or audiovisual modalities. The participants were asked to detect targets in visual modality or both visual and auditory modalities, which were presented on the same (cued) or opposite (uncued) side as the preceding visual peripheral cues. In Experiment 1, we found the comparable IOR with visual and audiovisual targets when participants were asked to selectively focus on visual modality. In Experiment 2, however, there was a smaller magnitude of IOR with audiovisual targets as compared with visual targets when paying attention to both visual and auditory modalities. We also observed a reduced multisensory response enhancement effect and race model inequality violation at cued locations relative to uncued locations. These results provide the first evidence of the IOR with audiovisual targets. Furthermore, IOR with audiovisual targets decreases when paying attention to both modalities. The interaction between exogenous spatial attention and audiovisual integration is discussed.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAudiovisual integrationAudiovisual targetExogenous spatial attentionInhibition of returnRace model inequality violation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.