ReviewWorld journal of urology2019
Which flexible ureteroscope is the best for upper tract urothelial carcinoma treatment?
Review in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced Endoscopic Imaging Technologies in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Tumors: Implications for Kidney-Sparing Surgery-A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Management and Treatment Strategies for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Insights.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- Reply to: "Photodynamic Diagnosis-Guided Ureteroscopic Laser Ablation of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Some Concerns and Future Direction".Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Being all-seeing gymnast within kidney cavity: analysis of the optical and flexibility characteristics trends of 61 flexible ureteroscopes over four decades.Urolithiasis · 2024Review
- What is the definition of stone dust and how does it compare with clinically insignificant residual fragments? A comprehensive review.World journal of urology · 2024Review
- Miniaturization of flexible ureteroscopes: a comparative trend analysis of 59 flexible ureteroscopes.Urolithiasis · 2023Review
- Consultation on UTUC II Stockholm 2022: diagnostics, prognostication, and follow-up-where are we today?World journal of urology · 2023Review
- Review
- Feasibility of multi-section continuum robotic ureteroscope in the kidney.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Endoscopic Papillary Abnormalities and Stone Recognition (EPSR) during Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Diagnostic challenges and treatment strategies in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.Turkish journal of urology · 2021Review
- Is a ureteral stent required before flexible ureteroscopy?Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
- Management of Low-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Unmet Need.Reviews in urology · 2020Article
- Consultation on UTUC Stockholm 2018.World journal of urology · 2019Article
- Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo present attributes of currently available flexible ureteroscopes to define the best flexible ureteroscope for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsScopus and Medline databases were searched for articles relating to performance of flexible ureteroscopes. A consensus for final inclusion of articles judged to be relevant for UTUC treatment was reached between the authors. Instrument characteristics were extracted from manufacturers' product brochures.
resultsSmaller cross-sectional size of instruments is associated with increased probability for successful primary access to the upper urinary tract. The smallest flexible ureteroscopes are fiberoptic scopes. Smaller ureteroscopes also allow comparatively increased irrigation flow at constant intrarenal pressure. Digital flexible ureteroscopes achieve superior image quality compared to their fiberoptic counterparts, at the price of lower end-deflection ability. Image enhancement technologies such as narrow-band imaging (NBI), photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) and Image 1-S (formerly SPIES) are based on subjective image interpretation by the operator. NBI and PDD significantly increase tumor detection rate. The highest subjective image quality score of the Image 1-S technology is reached by the "Clara + Chroma" mode. Single-use ureteroscopes offer potential advantages over reusable scopes, including sterility, absence of contamination, immediate availability and exemption of previous instrument wear.
conclusionsMiniaturization, digital image caption and image enhancement technologies seem to be the major determinants defining the best flexible ureteroscope for UTUC treatment. The impact of further factors, such as distal tip design, torque, working channel position, risk of contamination, as well as upcoming technological innovations should be evaluated in randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.