ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Parameter estimation in models of biological oscillators: an automated regularised estimation approach.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic modelling of cell cycle arrest through integrated single-cell and mathematical modelling approaches.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Experimentally Guided Iterative Parameter Estimation for Predictive Chemical Oscillator Models.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Review
- Building Digital Twins for Cardiovascular Health: From Principles to Clinical Impact.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Missing data in amortized simulation-based neural posterior estimation.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- From biological data to oscillator models using SINDy.iScience · 2024Article
- Reusable rule-based cell cycle model explains compartment-resolved dynamics of 16 observables in RPE-1 cells.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A general model-based causal inference method overcomes the curse of synchrony and indirect effect.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Neuraxial analgesia interfered with the circadian rhythm of labor: a propensity score matched cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Modeling the Nonlinear Dynamics of Intracellular Signaling Networks.Bio-protocol · 2021Article
- An optogenetic method for interrogating YAP1 and TAZ nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling.Journal of cell science · 2021Article
- A primer on model selection using the Akaike Information Criterion.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDynamic modelling is a core element in the systems biology approach to understanding complex biosystems. Here, we consider the problem of parameter estimation in models of biological oscillators described by deterministic nonlinear differential equations. These problems can be extremely challenging due to several common pitfalls: (i) a lack of prior knowledge about parameters (i.e. massive search spaces), (ii) convergence to local optima (due to multimodality of the cost function), (iii) overfitting (fitting the noise instead of the signal) and (iv) a lack of identifiability. As a consequence, the use of standard estimation methods (such as gradient-based local ones) will often result in wrong solutions. Overfitting can be particularly problematic, since it produces very good calibrations, giving the impression of an excellent result. However, overfitted models exhibit poor predictive power. Here, we present a novel automated approach to overcome these pitfalls. Its workflow makes use of two sequential optimisation steps incorporating three key algorithms: (1) sampling strategies to systematically tighten the parameter bounds reducing the search space, (2) efficient global optimisation to avoid convergence to local solutions, (3) an advanced regularisation technique to fight overfitting. In addition, this workflow incorporates tests for structural and practical identifiability.
resultsWe successfully evaluate this novel approach considering four difficult case studies regarding the calibration of well-known biological oscillators (Goodwin, FitzHugh-Nagumo, Repressilator and a metabolic oscillator). In contrast, we show how local gradient-based approaches, even if used in multi-start fashion, are unable to avoid the above-mentioned pitfalls.
conclusionsOur approach results in more efficient estimations (thanks to the bounding strategy) which are able to escape convergence to local optima (thanks to the global optimisation approach). Further, the use of regularisation allows us to avoid overfitting, resulting in more generalisable calibrated models (i.e. models with greater predictive power).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.