Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30770734›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Functional Heatmap: an automated and interactive pattern recognition tool to integrate time with multi-omics assays.

Joshua R Williams, Ruoting Yang, John L Clifford, Daniel Watson, Ross Campbell, Derese Getnet, Raina Kumar, Rasha Hammamieh, Marti Jett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Time-dependent changes in placental mRNA expression after delivery due to delayed specimen collection.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joshua R WilliamsAdvanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA.
Ruoting YangAdvanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-1999
John L CliffordIntegrative Systems Biology Program, US Army Center for Environmental Health Research, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA.
Daniel WatsonAdvanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA.
Ross CampbellAdvanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA.
Derese GetnetIntegrative Systems Biology Program, US Army Center for Environmental Health Research, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA.
Raina KumarAdvanced Biomedical Computational Science, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA.
Rasha HammamiehIntegrative Systems Biology Program, US Army Center for Environmental Health Research, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA.
Marti JettIntegrative Systems Biology Program, US Army Center for Environmental Health Research, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD, 21702-5010, USA. marti.jett-tilton.civ@mail.mil.

Funding

CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CMedical Research and Materiel Command 09284002NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLife science research is moving quickly towards large-scale experimental designs that are comprised of multiple tissues, time points, and samples. Omic time-series experiments offer answers to three big questions: what collective patterns do most analytes follow, which analytes follow an identical pattern or synchronize across multiple cohorts, and how do biological functions evolve over time. Existing tools fall short of robustly answering and visualizing all three questions in a unified interface.

resultsFunctional Heatmap offers time-series data visualization through a Master Panel page, and Combined page to answer each of the three time-series questions. It dissects the complex multi-omics time-series readouts into patterned clusters with associated biological functions. It allows users to identify a cascade of functional changes over a time variable. Inversely, Functional Heatmap can compare a pattern with specific biology respond to multiple experimental conditions. All analyses are interactive, searchable, and exportable in a form of heatmap, line-chart, or text, and the results are easy to share, maintain, and reproduce on the web platform.

conclusionsFunctional Heatmap is an automated and interactive tool that enables pattern recognition in time-series multi-omics assays. It significantly reduces the manual labour of pattern discovery and comparison by transferring statistical models into visual clues. The new pattern recognition feature will help researchers identify hidden trends driven by functional changes using multi-tissues/conditions on a time-series fashion from omic assays.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, AutomatedSoftwareComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHumansRadiation, IonizingSkinTime FactorsTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30770734
PMCPMC6377781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.