Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30770719›Full record

Observational studyThe journal of headache and pain2019

Real world preventative drug management of migraine among Spanish neurologists.

D García-Azorin, S Santos-Lasaosa, A B Gago-Veiga, J Viguera Romero, A L Guerrero-Peral

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The journal of headache and pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04138316 (CandeSpartan Study Candesartan Spanish Response-prediction and Tolerability Study Observational Study on Response Predictors and Tolerability of Candesartan in Usual Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04138316 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

CandeSpartan Study Candesartan Spanish Response-prediction and Tolerability Study Observational Study on Response Predictors and Tolerability of Candesartan in Usual Clinical Practice

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital Clínico Universitario de ValladolidRan2020 to 2022Enrolled85ConditionsMigraine, Head PainArmsCandesartan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

D García-AzorinHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valladolid, Avda. Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain. davilink@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-1064
S Santos-LasaosaHeadache Unit. Neurology Departmente, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
A B Gago-VeigaHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
J Viguera RomeroHeadache Unit, Neuroscience Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
A L Guerrero-PeralHeadache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Clínico de Valladolid, Avda. Ramón y Cajal 3, 47005, Valladolid, Spain.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany different preventatives have showed efficacy in the treatment of migraine. National guidelines differ in their recommendations and patients' characteristics are usually taken into account in their selection. In Spain, real life use of preventive therapies seems to be heterogeneous. We aimed to evaluate differences in clinical practice and adherence to national guidelines among Spanish neurologists.

methodsObservational descriptive study. A survey was conducted among neurologists ascribed to the Spanish Society of Neurology. Participants were differentiated in accordance with their dedication to headache disorders. We analysed socio-demographic parameters and evaluated 43 questions considering migraine management as well as therapeutic choices regarding migraine sub-types and finally, neurologists' personal perception.

resultsOne hundred fifty-five neurologists participated from 17 different regions, 43.4% of them female and 53.3% under 40 years of age. 34.9% confirmed headache disorders as their main interest. The first choice for preventive therapy in chronic migraine among participants was topiramate (57%) followed by amytriptiline (17.9%) and beta-blockers (14.6%). However in episodic migraine, the preferred options were beta-blockers (47.7%), topiramate (21.5%) and amytriptiline (13.4%). Regarding perceived efficacy, topiramate was considered the best option in chronic migraine (42.7%) followed by onabotulinumtoxinA (25.5%) and amitryptiline (22.4%). Where episodic migraine was concerned, surveyed neurologists perceived topiramate (43.7%) and beta-blockers (30.3%) as the best options. When we evaluated the duration of treatment use with a view to adequate therapeutic response, 43.5% of neurologists preferred 3 months duration and 39.5% were in favour of 6 months duration in episodic migraine. However, considering the preferred duration of treatment use in chronic migraine, 20.4% recommended 3 months, 42.1% preferred 6 months and 12.5% and 22.4% opted for 9 and 12 months respectively. When considering onabotulinumtoxinA therapy, the number of prior therapeutic failures was zero in 7.2% of neurologists, one in 5.9%, two in 44.1%, three in 30.9% and four or more in 11.9%. Following an initial treatment failure with onabotulinumtoxinA, 49% of subjects decided against a second treatment. The number of OnabotA procedures before considering it as ineffective was two in 18.9% of neurologists, three in 70.8% and four in 10.4%.

conclusionsThe initial management of migraine among Spanish Neurologists is in line with most guidelines, where first choice preventative drugs are concerned. The Management of episodic migraine differed from chronic migraine, both in terms of neurologist preference and in their perceived efficacy.

Indexed as

NeurologistsNeurologyPractice Patterns, Physicians'FemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMigraine DisordersPractice Guidelines as TopicSpainMigraineonabotulinumtoxinAPreventive treatmentPrimary headacheTopiramate

Identifiers

PMID30770719
PMCPMC6734505
OpenAlexW2913573598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.