Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30770609›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

The burden of proof: The process of involving young people in research.

Gail Dovey-Pearce, Sophie Walker, Sophie Fairgrieve, Monica Parker, Tim Rapley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Many Faces of Engagement: A Scoping Review of Paediatric Patient and Family Engagement in Clinical Care, Education and Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 'Co-Production Is Caring': Young People's Reflections on Responsible and Dialogic Co-Production in Youth Mental Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Working with children and young people in research: Supportive practices and pathways to impact.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Co-production of health and social science research with vulnerable children and young people: A rapid review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  10. 'Including us, talking to us and creating a safe environment'-Youth patient and public involvement and the Walking In ScHools (WISH) Study: Lessons learned.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A qualitative study exploring the benefits of involving young people in mental health research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gail Dovey-PearceInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8640-8263
Sophie WalkerNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Sophie FairgrieveNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Monica ParkerNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Tim RapleyInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under the Programme Grants for Applied Research programme RP-PG-0610-10112Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust's Research and Development Department
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient and public involvement in research includes non-academics working with researchers, on activities from consultative tasks, to joint working, and on user-led initiatives. Health and social care funding bodies require involvement in research projects. A current debate focuses on a perceived lack of empirical "proof" to demonstrate the impact of involvement upon the quality of research. It is also argued that the working relationships between researchers and those becoming involved need to be understood more fully. These areas are beginning to be reported upon but there are few studies of young people involved in health research. This study describes the experiences of adult academics and young people, working together on a large-scale, UK health research programme. Using qualitative interview and focus group methods, the aim was to explore participants' perceptions about the process and outcomes of their work together. The importance of cyclical, dynamic and flexible approaches is suggested. Enablers include having clear mechanisms for negotiation and facilitation, stakeholders having a vision of "the art of the possible," and centrally, opportunities for face-to-face working. What is needed is a continuing discourse about the challenges and benefits of working with young people, as distinct from younger children and adults, understanding the value of this work, without young people having to somehow "prove" themselves. Involvement relies on complex social processes. This work supports the view that an improved understanding of how key processes are enabled, as well as what involvement achieves, is now needed.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchPatient ParticipationAdolescentAge FactorsDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInformed ConsentMaleQualitative ResearchResearch SubjectsUnited KingdomYoung Adultinvolvementparticipationpatient and public involvementresearchyoung peopleyoung researchersyouth research

Identifiers

PMID30770609
PMCPMC6543165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.