Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30770401›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Stimulus-Driven Brain Rhythms within the Alpha Band: The Attentional-Modulation Conundrum.

Christian Keitel, Anne Keitel, Christopher S Y Benwell, Christoph Daube, Gregor Thut, Joachim Gross

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rhythmic stimulation elicits multiple, concurrent neural responses.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Spectral tuning and after-effects in neural entrainment.Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frequency tagging of spatial attention using periliminal flickers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian KeitelInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK, christian.keitel@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2597-5499
Anne KeitelInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-0146
Christopher S Y BenwellInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4157-4049
Christoph DaubeInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1763-8508
Gregor ThutInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1313-4262
Joachim GrossInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-1006

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098433/098434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two largely independent research lines use rhythmic sensory stimulation to study visual processing. Despite the use of strikingly similar experimental paradigms, they differ crucially in their notion of the stimulus-driven periodic brain responses: one regards them mostly as synchronized (entrained) intrinsic brain rhythms; the other assumes they are predominantly evoked responses [classically termed steady-state responses (SSRs)] that add to the ongoing brain activity. This conceptual difference can produce contradictory predictions about, and interpretations of, experimental outcomes. The effect of spatial attention on brain rhythms in the alpha band (8-13 Hz) is one such instance: alpha-range SSRs have typically been found to increase in power when participants focus their spatial attention on laterally presented stimuli, in line with a gain control of the visual evoked response. In nearly identical experiments, retinotopic decreases in entrained alpha-band power have been reported, in line with the inhibitory function of intrinsic alpha. Here we reconcile these contradictory findings by showing that they result from a small but far-reaching difference between two common approaches to EEG spectral decomposition. In a new analysis of previously published human EEG data, recorded during bilateral rhythmic visual stimulation, we find the typical SSR gain effect when emphasizing stimulus-locked neural activity and the typical retinotopic alpha suppression when focusing on ongoing rhythms. These opposite but parallel effects suggest that spatial attention may bias the neural processing of dynamic visual stimulation via two complementary neural mechanisms.

Indexed as

AdultAlpha RhythmAttentionBrainCortical SynchronizationElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adultalpha rhythmentrainmentfrequency taggingphase synchronizationspatial attentionsteady-state response (SSR)

Identifiers

PMID30770401
PMCPMC6468105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.