Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30770172›Full record

ReviewJournal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine

Research orientation in Ayurveda educational institutions: Challenges and the way forward.

Kishor Patwardhan, B S Prasad, Anam Aftab, Varsha Raghunath More, Shriram S Savrikar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kishor PatwardhanDepartment of Kriya Sharir, Faculty of Ayurveda, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. Electronic address: kpatwardhan@bhu.ac.in.
B S PrasadDepartment of Panchakarma, KLEU's Shri BMK Ayurved Mahavidyalaya, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Anam AftabDepartment of Kriya Sharir, Faculty of Ayurveda, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Varsha Raghunath MoreDepartment of Kriya Sharir, Faculty of Ayurveda, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Shriram S SavrikarFormer Professor of Rasashastra, Govt of Maharashtra Ayurved Services, India.
Banaras Hindu University · INGovernment Ayurved College, Nanded · INKLE Ayur World · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the scenario of research orientation in Ayurveda educational institutions of India. We demonstrate through the data obtained by searching the SCOPUS that the actual research output by these institutions is not very significant in terms of number of publications. While a lack of research expertise and infrastructure is one contributing factor to this status, a lack of questioning attitude is more crucial one. Mushrooming of new colleges, laxity in regulations, corruption, lack of atmosphere for ethical and quality research make the problem more complex. We show, with the help of SCOPUS Data, that the recent trend of establishing stand-alone institutions of Ayurveda may not help in invigorating research activities since the research contributions from such institutions have always been very poor. Instead, we suggest that existing stand-alone institutions of Ayurveda be merged with other established Central/State universities or other Medical colleges. The data demonstrates that the research output has been always significant when an institution has many experts working in different streams of science within, than when the institutions have only Ayurveda experts. We also take up the question of designing the clinical trials that are suitable for Ayurveda and propose an algorithm that may be considered for research in educational institutions, at least at doctoral level. We further enlist a set of recommendations that could potentially change the scenario. Evidence-informed policy making, inducting clinicians into the education system, making the curricula more attractive by including recent advances, introducing efficient faculty training programs, and rigorous implementation of the existing regulations - are some of the key recommendations we have made.

Identifiers

PMID30770172
PMCPMC6470304
OpenAlexW2914431346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.