Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30770135›Full record

ArticleSurgery2019

Patient preferences on the use of technology in cancer surveillance after curative surgery: A cross-sectional analysis.

Amblessed E Onuma, Elizabeth Palmer Kelly, Jeffery Chakedis, Anghela Z Paredes, Diamantis I Tsilimigras, Brianne Wiemann, Morgan Johnson, Katiuscha Merath, Ozgur Akgul, Jordan Cloyd and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Communicating blood test results in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Telemedicine in Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery: An Effective Alternative in Post COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Telemedicine: Patient-Provider Clinical Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amblessed E OnumaDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Elizabeth Palmer KellyComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Jeffery ChakedisDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Anghela Z ParedesDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Diamantis I TsilimigrasDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Brianne WiemannDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Morgan JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Katiuscha MerathDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Ozgur AkgulDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Jordan CloydDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus. Electronic address: Tim.pawlik@osumc.edu.

Funding

Advanced Research Training in Immunology for Surgery Trainees (ARTIST)T32AI106704 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GINNY L BUMGARDNER, Jon R Wisler · 2014 to 2026
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI106704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in communication technology have enabled new methods of delivering test results to cancer survivors. We sought to determine patient preferences regarding the use of newer technology in delivering test results during cancer surveillance.

methodsA single institutional, cross-sectional analysis of the preferences of adult cancer survivors regarding the means (secure digital communication versus phone call or office visit) to receive surveillance test results was undertaken.

resultsAmong 257 respondents, the average age was 59.1 years (SD 13.5) and 61.8% were female. Common malignancies included melanoma/sarcoma (29.5%), thyroid (25.7%), breast (22.8%), and gastrointestinal (22.0%) cancer. Although patients expressed a relative preference to receive normal surveillance results via MyChart or secure e-mail, the majority preferred abnormal imaging (87.2%) or blood results (85.9%) to be communicated by in-office appointments or phone calls irrespective of age or cancer type. Patients with a college degree or higher were more likely to prefer electronic means of communication of abnormal blood results compared with a telephone call or in-person visit (odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-4.73, P < .05). In contrast, patients >65 years were more likely to express a preference for telephone or in-person communication of normal imaging results (odds ratio: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.16-3.56, P < .05) versus patients ≤65 years. Preference also varied according to malignancy type.

conclusionAlthough many cancer patients preferred to receive "normal" surveillance results electronically, the majority preferred receiving abnormal results via direct conversation with their provider. Shifting routine communication of normal surveillance results to technology-based applications may improve patient satisfaction and decrease health care system costs.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient PreferenceAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsTelemedicineTelephone

Identifiers

PMID30770135
PMCPMC6420846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.