Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30769953›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Re-Evaluating Expertise: Principles for Food and Nutrition Security Research, Advocacy and Solutions in High-Income Countries.

Danielle Gallegos, Mariana M Chilton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Are the Australian Dietary Guidelines Fit for Purpose for Culturally Diverse Populations? A Qualitative Study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  4. Five Actions to Strengthen the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession Into the Future: Perspectives From Australia and New Zealand.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Urban Agriculture as a Means to Food Sovereignty? A Case Study of Baltimore City Residents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. To dine in or not to dine in: A comparison of food selection and preparation behaviours in those with and without food security.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Addressing Food and Nutrition Security in Developed Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  15. Food Insecurity and Hunger in Rich Countries-It Is Time for Action against Inequality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Danielle GallegosSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology; Brisbane 4059, Australia. danielle.gallegos@qut.edu.au.
Mariana M ChiltonDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. mmc33@drexel.edu.
Brisbane School of Theology · AUDrexel University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on examples from Australia and the United States, we outline the benefits of sharing expertise to identify new approaches to food and nutrition security. While there are many challenges to sharing expertise such as discrimination, academic expectations, siloed thinking, and cultural differences, we identify principles and values that can help food insecurity researchers to improve solutions. These principles are critical consciousness, undoing white privilege, adopting a rights framework, and engaging in co-creation processes. These changes demand a commitment to the following values: acceptance of multiple knowledges, caring relationships, humility, empathy, reciprocity, trust, transparency, accountability, and courage.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesFood SupplyAustraliaConsumer AdvocacyHumansProfessional CompetenceResearchSocial ValuesUnited Statesco-creationfood and nutrition securityresearchtrauma-informedvalues

Identifiers

PMID30769953
PMCPMC6406792
OpenAlexW2914408077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.