ReviewCancers2019
Current Therapeutic Results and Treatment Options for Older Patients with Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Midostaurin plus daunorubicin or idarubicin for young and older adults with FLT3-mutated AML: a phase 3b trial.Blood advances · 2023Trial
- Intensive Versus Non-Intensive Therapy in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Real-World Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Molecular Docking and Simulation-Based Exploration of Niclosamide as a Potential Inhibitor of the p62 ZZ Domain.Biology · 2026Article
- Real-World Utilization of Midostaurin in Combination with Intensive Chemotherapy for Patients withJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Does the Timing of Response Impact the Outcome of Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Venetoclax in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents? A Proof of Concept from a Monocentric Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Fitness assessment in acute myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome-containing regimens in treating refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of cladribine, low-dose cytarabine and venetoclax in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: results of a single center study.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Gut Microbiome as a Potential Marker of Hematologic Recovery Following Induction Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- DNA methylation landscape reveals GNAS as a decitabine-responsive marker in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Article
- 8-Hydroxydaidzein Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits AML-Associated Gene Expression in U-937 Cells: Potential Phytochemical for AML Treatment.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- French Retrospective Database Analysis of Patient Characteristics and Treatment Patterns in Patients with R/R FLT3-Mutated AML: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.Oncology and therapy · 2023Article
- Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Deserve Individualized Treatment.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Adult Patients in the PETHEMA Registry with Relapsed or RefractoryCancers · 2022Article
- EAPB0503, an Imidazoquinoxaline Derivative Modulates SENP3/ARF Mediated SUMOylation, and Induces NPM1c Degradation in NPM1 Mutant AML.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Natural Killer Cell-Mediated Immunotherapy for Leukemia.Cancers · 2022Review
- Functional Precision Medicine Provides Clinical Benefit in Advanced Aggressive Hematologic Cancers and Identifies Exceptional Responders.Cancer discovery · 2022Observational
- Venetoclax plus azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusion in treating acute myeloid leukemia patients who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Annals of hematology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considerable progress has been made in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, current therapeutic results are still unsatisfactory in untreated high-risk patients and poorer in those with primary refractory or relapsed disease. In older patients, reluctance by clinicians to treat unfit patients, higher AML cell resistance related to more frequent adverse karyotype and/or precedent myelodysplastic syndrome, and preferential involvement of chemorefractory early hemopoietic precursors in the pathogenesis of the disease further account for poor prognosis, with median survival lower than six months. A general agreement exists concerning the administration of aggressive salvage therapy in young adults followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation; on the contrary, different therapeutic approaches varying in intensity, from conventional salvage chemotherapy based on intermediate⁻high-dose cytarabine to best supportive care, are currently considered in the relapsed, older AML patient population. Either patients' characteristics or physicians' attitudes count toward the process of clinical decision making. In addition, several new drugs with clinical activity described as "promising" in uncontrolled single-arm studies failed to improve long-term outcomes when tested in larger randomized clinical trials. Recently, new agents have been approved and are expected to consistently improve the clinical outcome for selected genomic subgroups, and research is in progress in other molecular settings. While relapsed AML remains a tremendous challenge to both patients and clinicians, knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of the disease is fast in progress, potentially leading to personalized therapy in most patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.