Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30769851›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Unveiling Mesenchymal Stromal Cells' Organizing Function in Regeneration.

Peter P Nimiritsky, Roman Yu Eremichev, Natalya A Alexandrushkina, Anastasia Yu Efimenko, Vsevolod A Tkachuk, Pavel I Makarevich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Mechanisms and Emerging Therapeutics for Osteoporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hox-Positive Adult Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Beyond Positional Identity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter P NimiritskyInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical research and education center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119192, Russia. nimiritsky@gmail.com.
Roman Yu EremichevInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical research and education center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119192, Russia. romaneremichev@gmail.com.
Natalya A AlexandrushkinaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical research and education center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119192, Russia. n.alexandrushkina@gmail.com.
Anastasia Yu EfimenkoInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical research and education center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119192, Russia. aefimenko@mc.msu.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-0696-1369
Vsevolod A TkachukInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical research and education center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119192, Russia. tkachuk@fbm.msu.ru.
Pavel I MakarevichInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Medical research and education center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119192, Russia. pmakarevich@mc.msu.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-5190

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 17-04-01452Russian Foundation for Basic Research 18-315-20053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration is a fundamental process attributed to the functions of adult stem cells. In the last decades, delivery of suspended adult stem cells is widely adopted in regenerative medicine as a leading means of cell therapy. However, adult stem cells cannot complete the task of human body regeneration effectively by themselves as far as they need a receptive microenvironment (the niche) to engraft and perform properly. Understanding the mechanisms underlying mammalian regeneration leads us to an assumption that improved outcomes of cell therapy require a specific microenvironment that is generated in damaged areas prior to stem cell delivery. To a certain extent, it may be achieved by the delivery of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), not in dispersed form, but rather in self-organized cell sheets (CS) ⁻ tissue-like structures comprised of viable cells and microenvironment components: extracellular matrix and soluble factors deposited in the matrix. In this review, we highlight the potential role of MSCs as regeneration organizers and speculate that this function emerges in CS. This concept shifts our understanding of the therapeutic mechanism underlying a widely known CS-based delivery method for regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCellular MicroenvironmentExtracellular MatrixHumansRegenerationRegenerative Medicinecell deliverycell sheetmesenchymal stromal cellregenerationstem cellstromal cell

Identifiers

PMID30769851
PMCPMC6413004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.