Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30769137›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2019

Microgels: Modular, tunable constructs for tissue regeneration.

Jake P Newsom, Karin A Payne, Melissa D Krebs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Hydrogel Microparticles for Bone Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gas-modulating microcapsules for spatiotemporal control of hypoxia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jake P NewsomChemical & Biological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, United States.
Karin A PayneOrthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Melissa D KrebsChemical & Biological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, United States. Electronic address: mdkrebs@mines.edu.

Funding

Engineering a biopolymer hydrogel to inhibit osteogenesis: Implications for growth plate repairR21AR071585 · NIAMS · COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES · PI KREBS, MELISSA · 2018 to 2019
$354k
Endogenous repair of growth plate injuries by local and sequential delivery of factors that inhibit osteogenesis and promote chondrogenesisR03AR068087 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PAYNE, KARIN A · 2016 to 2018
$244k
NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR068087NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR071585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopolymer microgels are emerging as a versatile tool for aiding in the regeneration of damaged tissues due to their biocompatible nature, tunable microporous structure, ability to encapsulate bioactive factors, and tailorable properties such as stiffness and composition. These properties of microgels, along with their injectability, have allowed for their utilization in a multitude of different tissue engineering applications. Controlled release of growth factors, antibodies, and other bioactive factors from microgels have demonstrated their capabilities as transporters for essential bioactive molecules necessary for guiding tissue reconstruction. Additionally, recent in vitro studies of cellular interaction and proliferation within microgel structures have laid the initial groundwork for regenerative tissue engineering using these materials. Microgels have even been crosslinked together in various ways or 3D printed to form three-dimensional scaffolds to support cell growth. In vivo studies of microgels have pioneered the clinical relevance of these novel and innovative materials for regenerative tissue engineering. This review will cover recent developments and research of microgels as they pertain to bioactive factor release, cellular interaction and proliferation in vitro, and tissue regeneration in vivo. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review is focused on state-of-the-art microgel technology and innovations within the tissue engineering field, focusing on the use of microgels in bioactive factor delivery and as cell-interactive scaffolds, both in vitro and in vivo. Microgels are hydrogel microparticles that can be tuned based on the biopolymer from which they are derived, the crosslinking chemistry used, and the fabrication method. The emergence of microgels for tissue regeneration applications in recent years illuminates their versatility and applicability in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsMicrogelsRegenerationTissue EngineeringHumansBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsMicrogelsBiopolymersDrug deliveryMicrogelsRegenerative medicineTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30769137
PMCPMC6441611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.