Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30768781›Full record

ArticleCancer2019

"You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification.

Alsacia L Pacsi-Sepulveda, Rachel C Shelton, Carmen B Rodriguez, Arielle T Coq, Parisa Tehranifar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Psychosocial Impact of Breast Density Notification Through Breast Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perception of Breast Density Information Among Women in Miami, FL: a Qualitative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  15. Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness Among Latinas in a Low-Resource Setting.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2022
    Article
  16. Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge in a Mammography Screening Cohort of Predominantly Hispanic Women: Does Breast Density Notification Matter?Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alsacia L Pacsi-SepulvedaAdult Emergency Department, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6496-6339
Carmen B RodriguezDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6849-8050
Arielle T CoqDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Parisa TehranifarHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

Funding

Multilevel Determinants of Breast Cancer: Translating Research into InterventionsK07CA151777 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TEHRANIFAR, PARISA · 2011 to 2015
$654k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA151777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient advocacy has led to state-level legislative mandates for the release of personal mammographic breast density information to women undergoing screening mammography. More research is needed to understand the impact of this information on women's perceptions and mammography screening behavior.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted in English and Spanish with 24 self-identified Hispanic women who had undergone at least 1 mammogram since breast density notification was enacted in New York State. The women ranged in age from 43 to 63 years. Women were asked about their understanding and perceptions of the communication of New York State-mandated breast density information, and any actions they have taken or would take in response to this information. A content analysis of the qualitative data from the translated and transcribed interviews was conducted.

resultsThe majority of participants had no prior knowledge of breast density and expressed confusion and apprehension regarding the meaning of dense breasts when presented with the notification information. Many participants understood having dense breasts to be a serious and abnormal condition, and reported feelings of worry and vulnerability. Participants mostly expressed a strong interest in learning about breast density and obtaining additional and more frequent breast cancer screening tests. These behavioral intentions were consistent with participants' overall favorable view of breast cancer screening and a belief that their faith, as well as regular screening, can help to protect them from breast cancer morbidity and mortality.

conclusionsHispanic women conveyed proactive breast cancer screening intentions in response to breast density notification, despite inadequate comprehension of this information and negative emotional responses.

Indexed as

Breast DensityBreast NeoplasmsCommunicationEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHispanic or LatinoHumansMammographyMiddle AgedNew YorkPrognosisQualitative Researchbreast densityhealth policyHispanicmammographyrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID30768781
PMCPMC6541512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.