ArticleInternational nursing review2019
Validating international CanMEDS-based standards defining education and safe practice of nurse anesthetists.
Article in International nursing review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Nurse Conscientious Objection: Application of a Novel Framework.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026Article
- Evolution and Future Prospects of Nurse Anaesthetists in Catalonia: Inception, Upskilling and Scope of Practice.International nursing review · 2025Article
- International competencies of nurses with advanced practice in anesthesia nursing: An integrative review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Review
- Anaesthesiologists' perspectives of the need for nurse anaesthetists in South Africa.Curationis · 2025Article
- Knowing how, arguing why: nurse anaesthetists' experiences of nursing when caring for the surgical patient.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Digitalization in the operating theatre- an interview study of operating room nurses' and nurse anesthetists' experiences in Norway.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Prerequisites for entry to advanced nurse practitioner studies- a qualitative study of Norwegian nurse anesthetist students' experiences.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Development of individual competencies and team performance in interprofessional ward rounds: results of a study with multimodal observations at the Heidelberg Interprofessional Training Ward.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Defining competencies for nurse anaesthetists: A Delphi study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Article
- Anaesthesia personnels' perspectives on digital anaesthesia information management systems - a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- An online Delphi study to investigate the completeness of the CanMEDS Roles and the relevance, formulation, and measurability of their key competencies within eight healthcare disciplines in Flanders.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Experiences using an instrument for non-technical skills in nurse anaesthesia education: a focus group study.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Competency Framework for Podiatric Medicine Training in Canada: An Adapted Delphi Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- History of the Canadian Medical Education JournalHistorique du Journal canadien de l'éducation médicale (JCÉM).Canadian medical education journal · 2020Article
- Validating international CanMEDS-based standards defining education and safe practice of nurse anesthetists.International nursing review · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo investigate whether the CanMEDS-based International Federation of Nurse Anesthetists' Standards could adequately define the scope of practice and reliably be used to train and evaluate Swiss nurse anesthetists (NAs).
backgroundAlthough nurse anesthetists represent a majority of the global workforce in anesthesia, policies that define the scope of practice are frequently non-existent. In low- and middle-income countries, the lack of anesthesia providers with adequate training is a major challenge.
introductionDespite stringent training requirements, the scope of practice of Swiss nurse anesthetists is actually not defined. Therefore, we surveyed and assessed whether nurse anesthetists felt that the professional competencies outlined in this framework were aligned with their clinical practice.
methodsA cross-sectional survey investigated Swiss nurse anesthetists' relevance ratings of 76 competencies of the International Federation of Nurse Anesthetists according to their professional practice. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used to determine the internal consistency of the competencies, as well as factor analyses to assess construct validity of these competencies integrated into the CanMEDS roles model.
resultsParticipants rated the Standards overall as very relevant with high reliability. Factor analyses provided evidence of construct validity of these. DISCUSSION: The International Federation of Nurse Anesthetists' Standards of Practice provide a highly relevant framework and a valuable set of competencies for the scope of practice of Swiss nurse anesthetists, which enabled translation from global guides to local national standards. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: Adopted by low- and middle-income countries or countries where national standards are non-existent, this survey could introduce national and local policies at minimally acceptable standards of care for nurse anesthetists worldwide. The above standards have the potential to align education, outcomes and assessment of nurse anesthetists with the needs of national healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.