Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30768709›Full record

ArticleInternational nursing review2019

Validating international CanMEDS-based standards defining education and safe practice of nurse anesthetists.

C Herion, L Egger, R Greif, C Violato

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International nursing review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating Nurse Conscientious Objection: Application of a Novel Framework.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

C HerionDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4384-6044
L EggerCentre for Medical Education, Bern, Switzerland.
R GreifDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
C ViolatoDepartment of Medical Education, University Ambrosiana, Free University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Kantonsspital Aarau · CHPädagogische Hochschule Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

International Federation of Nurse Anesthetists (IFNA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate whether the CanMEDS-based International Federation of Nurse Anesthetists' Standards could adequately define the scope of practice and reliably be used to train and evaluate Swiss nurse anesthetists (NAs).

backgroundAlthough nurse anesthetists represent a majority of the global workforce in anesthesia, policies that define the scope of practice are frequently non-existent. In low- and middle-income countries, the lack of anesthesia providers with adequate training is a major challenge.

introductionDespite stringent training requirements, the scope of practice of Swiss nurse anesthetists is actually not defined. Therefore, we surveyed and assessed whether nurse anesthetists felt that the professional competencies outlined in this framework were aligned with their clinical practice.

methodsA cross-sectional survey investigated Swiss nurse anesthetists' relevance ratings of 76 competencies of the International Federation of Nurse Anesthetists according to their professional practice. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were used to determine the internal consistency of the competencies, as well as factor analyses to assess construct validity of these competencies integrated into the CanMEDS roles model.

resultsParticipants rated the Standards overall as very relevant with high reliability. Factor analyses provided evidence of construct validity of these. DISCUSSION: The International Federation of Nurse Anesthetists' Standards of Practice provide a highly relevant framework and a valuable set of competencies for the scope of practice of Swiss nurse anesthetists, which enabled translation from global guides to local national standards. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: Adopted by low- and middle-income countries or countries where national standards are non-existent, this survey could introduce national and local policies at minimally acceptable standards of care for nurse anesthetists worldwide. The above standards have the potential to align education, outcomes and assessment of nurse anesthetists with the needs of national healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansNurse AnesthetistsPractice Patterns, Nurses'Professional CompetenceQuality Assurance, Health CareSocieties, NursingSwitzerlandAnesthesiaAnesthesia ProvidersCanMEDSCompetency-Based Medical EducationInternational Federation of Nurse Anesthetists StandardsNon-PhysicianNurse AnesthetistsScope of PracticeSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID30768709
PMCPMC6850163
OpenAlexW2913965364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.