Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30768596›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Inadequate knowledge about snakebite envenoming symptoms and application of harmful first aid methods in the community in high snakebite incidence areas of Myanmar.

Mohammad Afzal Mahmood, Dale Halliday, Robert Cumming, Khin Thida Thwin, Mya Myitzu, Julian White, Sam Alfred, David A Warrell, David Bacon, Win Naing and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review of Human Poisoning and Toxic Exposures in Myanmar.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohammad Afzal MahmoodSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-8693
Dale HallidaySchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Robert CummingSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Khin Thida ThwinMinistry of Health and Sport, University of Medicine 1 & Yangon Specialist Hospital, Myanmar.
Mya MyitzuProject Field Team, Myanmar Snakebite Project, Mandalay, Myanmar.
Julian WhiteToxinology Department, Women's & Children Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Sam AlfredEmergency Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
David A WarrellNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7792-1615
David BaconSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Win NaingMinistry of Health and Sport, Myanmar.
Htay AungKyaukse District Government Hospital, Kyaukse Township, Myanmar.
Myat Myat TheinProject Field Team, Myanmar Snakebite Project, Mandalay, Myanmar.
Nyein Nyein ChitRegional Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health, Mandalay, Myanmar.
Sara SerhalSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Myat Thet NweProject Field Team, Myanmar Snakebite Project, Mandalay, Myanmar.
Pyae Phyo AungProject Field Team, Myanmar Snakebite Project, Mandalay, Myanmar.
Chen Au PehDepartment of Renal Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Kibale Chimpanzee Project · UGThe University of Adelaide · AUMinistry of Health · MMRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AUMinistry of Health and Sports · MMTechnological University Kyaukse · MMUniversity of Oxford · GBWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEvery year millions of people in developing countries suffer from snakebite, causing a large number of deaths and long term complications. Prevention and appropriate first aid could reduce the incidence and improve the health outcomes for those who suffer bites. However, many communities where snakebite is a major issue suffer from a lack of information about prevention and first aid measures that a family or community member could take to prevent severe envenoming, complications and poor outcomes. Myanmar suffers from a high burden of snakebites with a large number of deaths. As part of a health services and community development program, a community survey was conducted to identify communities' knowledge about snakebite and their sequelae, and knowledge and practice about first aid and health services use.

method4,276 rural residents of Kyaukse and Madaya townships in the Mandalay region were recruited by cluster sampling, involving random selection of 144 villages and random sampling of 30 households from each village. One adult member of each household was interviewed using a structured questionnaire.

resultsThe incidence of snakebite was 116/100,000 people. Respondents reported 15 different types of snakes in the area, with Russell's Viper, Cobra and Green snakes as the most common. 88% of the people informed that working in the fields and forests was when most of the bites occur. A majority knew about snakebite prevention methods such as wearing long boots. However, only a few people knew about the specific symptoms caused by snakebites. Only 39% knew about the correct methods of first aid. More than 60% mentioned tourniquet as a first aid method, though this may cause significant complications such as ischaemia of the limb. 88% said that they would take a snakebite victim to a government hospital, and 58% mentioned availability of antivenom as the reason for doing this. At the same time, the majority mentioned that traditional methods existed for first aid and treatment and 25% mentioned at least one harmful traditional method as an effective measure that they might use.

conclusionThe community is aware of snakebites as a major public health issue and know how to prevent them. However, the high incidence of snakebites point to lack of application of preventive methods. The community recognise the need for treatment with antivenom. However, inadequate knowledge about appropriate first aid methods, and a reliance on using tourniquets require a targeted education program. Existing knowledge in communities, albeit insufficient, provides a good starting point for mass media educational campaigns.

Indexed as

First AidHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAnimalsAntiveninsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMyanmarSnake BitesSnakesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAntivenins

Identifiers

PMID30768596
PMCPMC6395000
OpenAlexW2912331431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.