Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30768594›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

Parental legacy, demography, and admixture influenced the evolution of the two subgenomes of the tetraploid Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae).

Dmytro Kryvokhyzha, Adriana Salcedo, Mimmi C Eriksson, Tianlin Duan, Nilesh Tawari, Jun Chen, Maria Guerrina, Julia M Kreiner, Tyler V Kent, Ulf Lagercrantz and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Repeated polyploidization shapes divergence in floral morphology inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Whole-genome duplication increases genetic diversity and load in outcrossingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The evolution of the hypotetraploidFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Dmytro KryvokhyzhaPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-1977
Adriana SalcedoDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mimmi C ErikssonPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9548-8226
Tianlin DuanPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8719-7998
Nilesh TawariComputational and Systems Biology Group, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*Star), Singapore.
Jun ChenPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3187-7668
Maria GuerrinaPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Julia M KreinerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Tyler V KentDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8904-1655
Ulf LagercrantzPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
John R StinchcombeDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3349-2964
Sylvain GléminPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stephen I WrightDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9973-9697
Martin LascouxPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1699-9042
Uppsala University · SEUniversity of Toronto · CAAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allopolyploidy is generally perceived as a major source of evolutionary novelties and as an instantaneous way to create isolation barriers. However, we do not have a clear understanding of how two subgenomes evolve and interact once they have fused in an allopolyploid species nor how isolated they are from their relatives. Here, we address these questions by analyzing genomic and transcriptomic data of allotetraploid Capsella bursa-pastoris in three differentiated populations, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. We phased the two subgenomes, one descended from the outcrossing and highly diverse Capsella grandiflora (CbpCg) and the other one from the selfing and genetically depauperate Capsella orientalis (CbpCo). For each subgenome, we assessed its relationship with the diploid relatives, temporal changes of effective population size (Ne), signatures of positive and negative selection, and gene expression patterns. In all three regions, Ne of the two subgenomes decreased gradually over time and the CbpCo subgenome accumulated more deleterious changes than CbpCg. There were signs of widespread admixture between C. bursa-pastoris and its diploid relatives. The two subgenomes were impacted differentially depending on geographic region suggesting either strong interploidy gene flow or multiple origins of C. bursa-pastoris. Selective sweeps were more common on the CbpCg subgenome in Europe and the Middle East, and on the CbpCo subgenome in Asia. In contrast, differences in expression were limited with the CbpCg subgenome slightly more expressed than CbpCo in Europe and the Middle-East. In summary, after more than 100,000 generations of co-existence, the two subgenomes of C. bursa-pastoris still retained a strong signature of parental legacy but their evolutionary trajectory strongly varied across geographic regions.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, PlantTetraploidyAsiaCapsellaDiploidyDNA, PlantEuropeGenetics, PopulationHybridization, GeneticMiddle EastModels, GeneticMutationPhylogenyPhylogeographyPolyploidyDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID30768594
PMCPMC6395008
OpenAlexW2953046607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.