Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30768401›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2019

Reading Acquisition in Children: Developmental Processes and Dyslexia-Specific Effects.

Katarzyna Chyl, Bartosz Kossowski, Agnieszka Dębska, Magdalena Łuniewska, Artur Marchewka, Kenneth R Pugh, Katarzyna Jednoróg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katarzyna ChylNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Bartosz KossowskiNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka DębskaNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena ŁuniewskaNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland; Warsaw University, Poland.
Artur MarchewkaNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Kenneth R PughHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Katarzyna JednorógNencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: k.jednorog@nencki.gov.pl.

Funding

Visual word identification: phonology &morphologyP01HD001994 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI MENCL, EINAR · 1985 to 2016
$23.5M
Tracking neurocognitive changes during evidence-based reading instruction in typically and atypically developing childrenR37HD090153 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI Kenneth R. Pugh · 2017 to 2026
$6.0M
Predictors of Non- Response in Young Dyslexic Children with Co-Morbid ADHDP01HD070837 · NICHD · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZEVIN, JASON D · 2013 to 2018
$4.6M
Neurochemistry as a moderator of brain networks for readingR01HD086168 · NICHD · HASKINS LABORATORIES, INC. · PI HOEFT, FUMIKO, PUGH, KENNETH R. · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD001994NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD070837NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086168NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD090153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDecreased activation to print in the left ventral, dorsal, and anterior pathways has been implicated in readers with dyslexia (DRs) but also is characteristic for typical beginning readers. Because most studies have compared DRs with their age-matched peers, the observed results could represent a dyslexia phenotype or a developmental delay. This study aimed to disentangle reading and dyslexia effects using 2 control groups matched for age and skill and a longitudinal design.

methodBrain response for print was compared in DRs and typical readers (TRs) who, at the beginning of schooling (time point 1 [TP]; 6-7 years old), read on average 3 words per minute, as did DRs at TP1, but improved their reading to an average level, and advanced readers (ARs) who at TP1 read as well as DRs 2 years later (TP3; 8-9 years old). The TR and DR groups were tracked longitudinally to observe neurodevelopmental changes.

resultsAt TP1, DRs did not differ from TRs. Over time, only TRs developed a neural circuit for reading in the left inferior frontal and fusiform gyri. At TP3, DRs exhibited hypo-activation in these areas compared with age-matched (TRs at TP3) and reading-matched (ARs at TP1) controls. At TP3, TRs showed hypo-activation in the left frontal and bilateral ventral occipital regions compared with ARs, but these effects were nonoverlapping with DR hypo-activations and are partly explained by IQ.

conclusionDecreased activation of the left fusiform and inferior frontal gyri to print in DRs results from an atypical developmental trajectory of reading and cannot be explained solely by lower reading skills.

Indexed as

ReadingBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesCerebral CortexChildDyslexiaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaledyslexiadyslexia debatelongitudinal functional magnetic resonance imagingreading acquisitionreading development

Identifiers

PMID30768401
PMCPMC6606402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.